PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Brooks Women's Glycerin 23

Brooks · Synthetic Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

Brooks Women's Glycerin 23

Bad

Running shoe with likely water-resistant coating; PFAS status undisclosed by brand.

Verdict · SkipRunning shoe with undisclosed water-repellent coating (likely PFAS); no reported textile hazards, but brand opacity on chemical treatment warrants cautious purchase with care practices.

Brooks does not disclose PFAS in Glycerin 23. Water-resistant running shoes commonly use water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Knit textile upper with water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Knit upper has water-repellent treatment; Brooks does not disclose chemical composition. Most shoes in this category still use PFAS-based water-repellent coating unless explicitly stated otherwise. Graded separately per your request.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Polyester content in the knit upper may contain trace antimony as a polymerization catalyst. Levels in finished textiles are typically below migration thresholds for direct skin contact, but prolonged wear in high-sweat conditions could theoretically increase surface accumulation.

70/ 100

Adhesive and sole-upper interface degradation

Brooks running shoes, including the Glycerin line, have occasional reports of upper-midsole separation after 200-400 miles of use. While not a chemical hazard, delamination can expose adhesive residues. This is a durability issue rather than a baseline safety problem.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or public testing data indicate formaldehyde use in Brooks Glycerin 23 uppers or finishes. Knit athletic textiles rarely require formaldehyde for wrinkle resistance, making this a low-concern hazard class for running shoes.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes and allergenic colorants

Brooks does not use restricted azo dyes per standard textile supplier practice in the US market. No documented contact dermatitis or dye-related complaints specific to this model exist in public records.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Glycerin 23 upper is a knit textile (polyester and nylon blend typical for Brooks running shoes) treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings historically used PFAS-based chemistry to repel water; Brooks does not publicly disclose the chemical class of its water-repellent coating treatment on this model. The mesh and knit materials themselves are not inherently hazardous, but the treatment layer is the chemical concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Brooks has not published a formal PFAS elimination timeline or commitment as of public record. The brand does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on product specification sheets for the Glycerin line. No major textile safety recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye violations are documented for Brooks running shoes. This silence on chemical treatment is the primary disclosure gap relative to competitors like Salomon and some Altra models, which have begun naming fluorine-free water-repellent coating alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Brooks Glycerin sits in the premium cushioned running shoe segment where water-repellent coating treatment is standard. Most shoes in this price tier ($150-180) use traditional fluorinated water-repellent coating; some brands (Altra, Cotopaxi-affiliated footwear) now offer fluorine-free water-repellent coating options. Brooks' Glycerin does not market itself as a low-chemical alternative, making it typical for mainstream athletic footwear rather than an outlier in safety profile.

If you buy it

Wash by hand or gentle machine cycle in cold water to reduce heat stress on the water-repellent coating and any polymer components. Avoid high heat drying (air dry preferred); heat can degrade knit integrity and potentially increase leaching from treatments. Replace when midsole cushioning visibly compresses or upper seams separate (typically 300-500 miles for running shoes). If water repellency fades, do not reapply consumer-grade fluorinated water-repellent coating sprays without checking for PFAS-free certifications on the product.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Brooks has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Synthetic Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

PowerStep Pulse Performance Insoles

Powerstep

Pulse Performance Insoles

EVA foam, gel, fabric blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes in fabric blend

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

These insoles likely skip PFAS, but the brand says nothing about it.

Starting grade for this product type

POWERSTEP PULSE E

Powerstep

PULSE E

foam insoles, textile upper

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes in textile coloring

Limited concern

70
🫧

Foam degradation and microparticle shedding

Limited concern

70

Foam and textile insoles with no coating or water-repellent finish on record.

Starting grade for this product type

PowerStep PULSE Maxx Orthotic Running Shoe Insert

Powerstep

PULSE Maxx Orthotic Running Shoe Insert

Foam, fabric, and elastomer blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good

Polyurethane foam degradation and volatile release

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin sensitization from uncertified materials

Limited concern

70

PFAS concern is unlikely, though brand silence limits certainty.

Starting grade for this product type

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.