PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall43/ 100Poor
COS Women's Bonded-Scuba V-Neck Bikini Top

COS · Swimwear

COS Women's Bonded-Scuba V-Neck Bikini Top

Good

Lower PFAS concern, but COS offers no transparency about their practices.

Verdict · SkipNylon swimwear with lower PFAS risk; no major hazards reported for this material class or brand. Standard care mitigates textile concerns.

This bonded-scuba bikini top is a nylon-blend textile with no marketed waterproofing, stain resistance, or nonstick coating that would require PFAS. COS provides no public statement on PFAS in manufacturing or finishes.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyamide blend (bonded-scuba knit)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What COS Women's Bonded-Scuba V-Neck Bikini Top is made of, ingredients and materials

This bikini top is nylon/polyamide bonded-scuba knit, a synthetic fabric engineered for stretch, durability, and chlorine/saltwater resistance. Nylon does not naturally repel water, so swimwear nylon is typically treated with a water-resistant finish, historically PFAS-based but increasingly non-PFAS alternatives are available. The bonded construction (nylon laminated to a backing layer) improves structure and reduces transparency. Unlike polyester, nylon has lower thermal sensitivity and does not shed microplastics as readily during normal wear or washing.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes

COS nylon swimwear may use azo dye colorants; while bluesign-certified facilities restrict problematic azo dyes, no product-specific test data is public. Risk is low in swimwear since minimal skin contact occurs on finished garment, but workers in dyeing steps face higher exposure.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Bonded nylon may include formaldehyde-based adhesives or wrinkle-resist treatments; COS manufacturing is governed by REACH/ZDHC standards which limit but do not eliminate formaldehyde residues. Levels in finished swimwear are typically well below regulatory thresholds, and off-gassing is negligible after first wash.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish toxicity

Swimwear nylon requires water-repellent coating treatment. Historically PFAS-based; COS does not disclose replacement chemistry. Some alternative water-repellent coating systems (e.g., wax-based) are less persistent in environment but equally effective on fabric. Skin absorption through a finished bikini top is extremely low.

45/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Nylon fibers can shed during washing; however, bonded-scuba knit is tightly constructed and sheds less than loose weaves. The amount released per garment wash is on the order of micrograms to low milligrams, lower than polyester fleece but present. Wear a lint-catch filter or wash in a microfiber net to reduce release.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyamide

Antimony trioxide is sometimes used as a catalyst in polyamide synthesis, but finished nylon fiber contains only trace residual antimony tightly bound in polymer chains. Leaching into skin or sweat from a finished garment is not documented and considered negligible risk.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

COS (a Inditex subsidiary, parent of Zara) has committed to bluesign certification and restricted substance lists for apparel, but does not publicly detail PFAS replacement strategies or post individual product test reports. The brand maintains general sustainability standards but remains silent on water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatments applied to swimwear specifically. No recalls or documented contamination incidents are on record for COS swimwear.

How it compares in its category

Standard swimwear (nylon, polyester, or poly-blend) typically uses water-repellent coating finishes; COS occupies the mainstream middle ground with no transparency advantage or disadvantage versus competitors like Speedo or Nike. Some premium brands now advertise PFAS-free finishes, but COS does not market this distinction. The bonded-scuba construction is common and poses no additional chemical risk versus unlined nylon.

If you buy it

Rinse after every saltwater or chlorinated pool use to remove salt and oxidizers; air-dry away from direct heat or sunlight to preserve elastic fibers and water-repellent coating. Hand wash in cool water with mild detergent every 3-5 wears; avoid fabric softener and bleach, which degrade water repellency. Replace when seams fray, elastic loses recovery, or pilling becomes excessive (typically 1-2 years with regular use). Do not expose to prolonged heat (sauna, dryer) as this can degrade both the nylon and any water-repellent coating treatment.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
COS has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.