PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall53/ 100Good
Scuba Swimsuit

COS · Swimwear

Scuba Swimsuit

Good

Lower concern with no known PFAS triggers, but COS offers no public transparency.

Verdict · SkipPolyamide/polyester swimwear with no established hazard record; COS lacks transparency but material choice is standard-safe for category.

COS scuba swimsuits typically use standard nylon or polyester blends without advertised water-repellent or stain-resistant finishes suggesting PFAS use. COS does not publicly disclose PFAS or water-resistant treatment policy.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyamide (nylon) or polyester blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Scuba Swimsuit is made of, ingredients and materials

COS scuba swimsuits are constructed from polyamide (nylon) or polyester blends, both synthetic polymers chosen for elasticity, chlorine resistance, and durability in wet environments. Neither material is inherently hazardous when properly formulated. The coating or finish applied during manufacture (e.g., for water-shedding or stretch recovery) is the primary exposure point; nylon and polyester do not naturally leach toxic compounds into skin during normal wear, unlike some ceramics or metals.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

Polyamide and polyester both commonly accept azo-based reactive dyes during manufacture. These can degrade into aromatic amines under sweat and UV exposure, though risk is low in finished garments with standard EU/US dye regulations. COS does not disclose dye chemistry for this product.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Elasticity and wrinkle-resistance finishes sometimes use formaldehyde-releasing resins in synthetic blends. Scuba suits with stretch recovery or water-shedding treatments may contain trace amounts; off-gassing risk is minimal after manufacturing and first wash. No specific testing data available for COS swimwear.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Water-repellent or elasticity-boosting coatings on polyamide can wear away with friction, chlorine, and UV, potentially releasing microplastic particles into water. Frequency depends on care and use intensity; standard washing and air-drying minimizes this.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester

Polyester can contain antimony as a catalyst residue from polymerization. Leaching into skin or sweat is negligible in finished textiles and not documented as a risk in swimwear. COS polyester blends are not known to have elevated antimony.

95/ 100
✅

Fragrance and allergenic additives in elastic or dye

COS swimwear is not marketed with fragrance, and no documented contact dermatitis incidents are on record. Residual dyes or processing chemicals can trigger sensitivity in rare cases, but this is not a known issue for this brand or product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

COS, owned by H&M Group, does not publish detailed chemical or PFAS transparency reports specific to individual garments. The parent company has committed to phasing out certain chemicals but provides no itemized disclosure for this product line. No recalls or documented chemical safety incidents are on record for COS swimwear. Absence of controversy does not equal verification of safety; it reflects limited public scrutiny rather than confirmed clean testing.

How it compares in its category

Polyamide and polyester swimwear are industry standard and pose lower chemical risk than vintage or bargain elastane-heavy alternatives. Most mainstream brands (Speedo, ROXY, Patagonia) use identical base polymers. COS positioning in the mid-market means formulation is unlikely to include experimental or cost-cutting additives that trigger hazards, but also means no premium-tier chemical verification is guaranteed. Compared to niche eco-brands offering GOTS certification or chemical testing, COS offers no differentiation in safety documentation.

If you buy it

Rinse immediately after saltwater or chlorinated pool use to remove residual chemicals and salts that can degrade elasticity and finishes. Wash separately in cool water without fabric softener, which can compromise stretch. Air-dry away from direct heat and sunlight; tumble drying accelerates polymer breakdown. Replace every 12-18 months of regular use (twice weekly or more) as elastic fibers fatigue and coating may thin. Do not expose to solvents or prolonged heat over 40°C (104°F).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
COS has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.