PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
Hunza G Clara One-Shoulder Swimsuit

Hunza G · Swimwear

Hunza G Clara One-Shoulder Swimsuit

Good

Reduced risk; standard synthetic swim fabric without reported water-repellent coating treatment.

Verdict · SkipNylon-elastane swimwear with no reported chemical hazards; standard synthetic fabric without water-repellent coating or flame retardant treatment reduces exposure risk.

Hunza G's Clara is a nylon-elastane blend with no disclosed stain or water-repellent treatment, reducing PFAS concern compared to technical apparel. Brand silence on PFAS mirrors typical swimwear industry practice.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon elastane blend (swimsuit fabric)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Hunza G Clara One-Shoulder Swimsuit is made of, ingredients and materials

The Clara One-Shoulder is constructed from nylon and elastane (spandex), a common high-performance swimwear blend. Nylon provides durability and water resistance; elastane adds stretch and recovery. Unlike some technical swimwear, there is no public record of this garment receiving water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish, which would introduce PFAS or other chemical coatings. The weave is tightly engineered to reduce chlorine absorption and pilling, typical of premium swim fabric.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Elastane degradation and microfiber shedding

All elastane garments shed microscopic fibers with wear and washing; this is a material property, not a brand defect. Hunza G does not claim special anti-shedding treatment, so standard fiber release is expected.

70/ 100
⚠️

Allergens in elastic components

Elastane itself is hypoallergenic, but synthetic rubber fillers or accelerants used in elastane production may trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Hunza G does not disclose elastane supplier or accelerant chemistry.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Azo dyes (colorfast release)

No public testing or recalls identify azo dyes or non-colorfast dyes in Hunza G swimwear. Nylon typically accepts dyes well, but brand does not disclose whether low-heavy-metal or restricted-substance dyes are used.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No test data or recalls on file for lead, cadmium, or antimony in Hunza G swim fabric. The brand's premium positioning suggests responsible sourcing, but lack of OEKO-TEX or similar certification prevents independent confirmation.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon-elastane blends rarely require formaldehyde resin cross-linking for durability. No public record of formaldehyde concerns in Hunza G swimwear; the risk is lower than in cotton or linen apparel.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Hunza G does not publicly disclose detailed chemical composition, manufacturing standards, or third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or GOTS). The brand markets sustainable practices but does not transparently detail testing for heavy metals, azo dyes, or restricted substances. No major chemical safety recalls or violations are recorded for Hunza G products in public databases. This silence on disclosure is typical of contemporary luxury swimwear brands but limits independent verification of lower-tier chemical hazards.

How it compares in its category

Most premium nylon-elastane swimwear (Eres, Solid and Striped, Lenny Niemeyer) operates under similar opacity regarding chemical testing. Hunza G's choice to avoid water-repellent coating treatment results in lower concern compared to technical/athletic swimwear that uses fluorinated coatings. The one-shoulder silhouette carries no additional chemical or durability risk compared to standard cuts. Price point and brand positioning suggest quality dyeing and finishing, though batch-to-batch variability in manufacture cannot be ruled out without testing.

If you buy it

Rinse the swimsuit in cold fresh water immediately after seawater or chlorine exposure to reduce salt and chlorine buildup, which accelerates elastane degradation. Wash by hand in cool water with gentle detergent; avoid bleach and fabric softener, which degrade the elastic fibers. Air dry flat or on a hanger; do not tumble dry or expose to direct heat, which weakens elastane recovery. Replace after 2 to 3 years of regular use, or sooner if elastane loses recovery (sagging, bagging at seams).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hunza G has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.