PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall58/ 100Good
Playtex Sport Super+5

Playtex · Period Pads

Playtex Sport Super+5

Good

Lower concern. No known PFAS-prone materials in tampons.

Verdict: BuyRayon core and plastic applicator carry minimal established hazards; no major brand safety controversies on record. Lower PFAS concern supports selection.

Playtex Sport uses standard rayon and plastic components with no disclosed waterproofing or stain-resistant coatings. No public PFAS testing available, but tampons rarely require PFAS-based treatments.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Rayon/cellulose absorbent core, plastic applicator

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Allergens and irritants in rayon or cellulose additives

Rayon itself is hypoallergenic, but finishing agents, antimicrobials, or fragrances added to improve absorbency or odor control are not fully disclosed. Individual sensitivity is rare but documented in case reports; no batch-level testing results are publicly available.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial overgrowth and toxic shock syndrome (TSS) risk

TSS is associated with prolonged tampon use and high absorbency, not material composition. Super+ absorbency increases risk if worn beyond 4-8 hours; this is a use behavior hazard, not a product defect, but material choice (rayon vs. cotton) does not significantly alter risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance or odor-control chemical sensitivity

Sport variants often include odor-control additives not itemized on packaging. Fragrance compounds and antimicrobials can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals; unscented alternatives may pose lower risk if you have known sensitivities.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100

Dioxins and furans from legacy chlorine bleaching

Modern rayon production has moved away from high-chlorine bleaching; no recent recalls or detected contamination in commercial tampons. Residual risk is considered negligible in current manufacturing.

95/ 100

Plastic applicator leachables (styrene, oligomers)

Single-use plastic applicators pose minimal contact time and low chemical leaching risk under body temperature. No health complaints or regulatory findings specific to Playtex applicators are on record.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Playtex Sport Super+5 uses a rayon/cellulose absorbent core derived from wood pulp, which is chemically processed but does not inherently concentrate heavy metals or toxic residues in the way some synthetic polymers do. The plastic applicator (likely polystyrene or polyethylene) is a single-use component that does not contact the absorbing material under normal use and poses minimal leaching risk during the brief insertion window. Rayon itself has a long safety history in period care and is not associated with reported reproductive or systemic toxicity at typical use levels.

The brand's record and disclosure

Playtex has not published extensive ingredient disclosure or third-party safety certifications (e.g., FDA Device Master Record details, allergen testing summaries) in the public domain, which limits transparency compared to some competitors. No major recalls or health complaints specific to this product line are established in regulatory databases. The brand's silence on PFAS is consistent with the industry norm for period care, where PFAS use is not a documented concern and many manufacturers do not proactively address it.

How it compares in its category

Rayon-core tampons like this are mid-range in safety profile: rayon is less controversial than older chlorine-bleached viscose (which raised dioxin concerns decades ago, now largely addressed), but less documented than 100% organic cotton alternatives. Plastic applicators are standard and pose fewer documented risks than cardboard; the trade-off is environmental waste rather than direct health hazard. Sport variants typically add no additional chemical treatments beyond standard antimicrobial or odor-control additives, which are minimally studied but rare sources of complaint.

If you buy it

Use as directed and replace every 4-8 hours to minimize any hypothetical bacterial overgrowth risk (standard menstrual management practice). Applicator disposal should follow local guidelines; do not flush plastic applicators. If you experience allergic irritation, rash, or unusual odor, discontinue and consult a physician; individual sensitivity to rayon or additives is possible but uncommon. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent moisture ingress and mold.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Playtex has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.