PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall49/ 100Poor
Puma Evercushion Pro insole width mid

Puma · Synthetic Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

Puma Evercushion Pro insole width mid

Good

Lower concern. Foam insoles lack typical PFAS triggers.

Verdict · SkipFoam insoles present minimal established hazards; Puma has no major recalls tied to insole chemistry. Standard care sufficient.

Puma Evercushion Pro is a foam insole without waterproof or stain-resistant coatings that commonly contain PFAS. Puma discloses no PFAS information.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

foam cushioning, textile upper

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing

Aqua Pure

3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing

95ExcellentPFAS grade
  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

AQUASURE Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

Aquasure

Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

What Puma Evercushion Pro insole width mid is made of, ingredients and materials

Puma Evercushion Pro insoles use proprietary foam cushioning (likely polyurethane or EVA-based) bonded to textile uppers. Foam cushioning in footwear typically avoids the coatings, glazes, and heavy-metal pigments that trigger major hazards in cookware or ceramics. The textile layer is the primary exposure point; synthetic shoe textiles are generally low-risk unless treated with problematic dyes or finishes.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Textile uppers may contain formaldehyde-releasing resins for wrinkle resistance or anti-microbial treatment. Puma does not specify finish chemistry for this line; off-gassing risk is low in insoles due to limited surface area and indirect skin contact.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

Textile upper may be dyed with azo colorants, which can break down under sweat and skin contact to release aromatic amines. Risk is minor because insoles have indirect contact with skin and typical wear conditions do not strongly promote dye degradation.

70/ 100
🫧

Polyurethane foam degradation and particulate shedding

Polyurethane foam degrades over time with flex and moisture exposure, potentially shedding microparticles into the shoe. This is a wear-related hazard common to all foam insoles; replacement frequency mitigates risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

Adhesive volatiles (VOCs) in bonding layers

Foam-to-textile bonding typically uses polyurethane or rubber adhesives that can off-gas during the first weeks of use. Puma does not disclose adhesive formulations; initial off-gassing is generally mild and resolves quickly with airing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester textiles

Antimony is a byproduct catalyst in polyester synthesis and can leach in trace amounts. Insole textiles are not documented to pose antimony exposure risk, and no recalls or warnings exist for this product line.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Puma does not publicly disclose detailed material safety data for individual insole lines, and the brand has not made prominent commitments to PFAS phase-out in apparel as of recent records. No major safety recalls specific to Evercushion Pro insoles are documented. Puma's transparency on chemical use in footwear lags leaders like Adidas, but established hazard incidents tied to insoles themselves are not on record.

How it compares in its category

Foam insoles are inherently lower-risk than leather-lined or heavily treated shoe components because they avoid tanning chemicals, synthetic dyes, and adhesive-heavy construction. Evercushion Pro sits mid-market for insole technology and safety profile; premium brands (Nike, On) offer slightly more transparency, but budget alternatives carry similar chemical uncertainty. Replacement insoles in general pose minimal cumulative exposure compared to full footwear.

If you buy it

Replace insoles every 6-12 months or when cushioning flattens, as degraded foam may shed microparticles. Store in a dry place to prevent mold growth in the textile layer. Avoid prolonged exposure to heat (dishwasher, direct sunlight) as polyurethane foam can break down. Hand wash textile covers if needed with mild soap and air dry.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Puma has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.