PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Rachael Ray Create Delicious Hard Anodized Aluminum Nonstick Deep Skillet

Rachael Ray · Nonstick Skillets

Rachael Ray Create Delicious Hard Anodized Aluminum Nonstick Deep Skillet

Bad

Pass until Rachael Ray reveals nonstick coating type or commits to PFAS-free.

Verdict: SkipHard anodized aluminum base is safe; nonstick coating type unknown and undisclosed by brand, creating moderate uncertainty beyond PFAS risk.

Rachael Ray's hard-anodized aluminum skillet hides its nonstick coating composition and makes no PFAS-free claim. No third-party verification exists.

The safe swap

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

GreenPan

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

hard anodized aluminum with nonstick coating (unspecified type)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating thermal degradation / nonstick fume risk

If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (not disclosed), heating above 500F can degrade the polymer and release perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) precursors and other volatile compounds. Rachael Ray does not specify the safe temperature ceiling, forcing users to guess and assume standard nonstick caution (avoid preheating empty, keep below medium-high).

70/ 100
💨

Nonstick coating degradation and microflake inhalation

Normal wear, stacking, and utensil contact can cause the nonstick surface to flake or peel over time. Ingesting small coating fragments is generally considered low toxicity, but inhaling fumes from degradation or scratching in high-heat scenarios carries unknown respiratory risk, especially in unventilated kitchens.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating adhesion loss and substrate exposure

Dishwasher use, metal utensils, and thermal cycling can weaken the bond between the anodized layer and nonstick coating over months or years. Once coating separates, the aluminum substrate beneath is exposed; while anodization resists some leaching, aged or damaged anodization may allow minor aluminum migration at acidic pH (tomato sauces, vinegar).

70/ 100
🍳

Unknown nonstick polymer composition

Rachael Ray's silence on coating type means consumers cannot assess specific chemical hazards, shelf life, or thermal safety. Multiple industry reports (FDA guidance, CPSC notices) have flagged lack of transparency as a consumer protection gap; this product exemplifies that problem.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Hard anodized aluminum leaching

The hard anodization process creates a robust oxide barrier that prevents aluminum migration into food under normal pH and cooking conditions. No documented cases of aluminum leaching from hard anodized cookware exist in the scientific literature; this hazard is not a concern for this specific substrate type.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This skillet uses hard anodized aluminum as its substrate, a durable electrochemical process that creates a sealed oxide layer resistant to corrosion and leaching. Hard anodization itself is considered stable and does not pose aluminum leaching risk under normal cooking conditions because the oxide barrier prevents direct contact between food and base metal. The nonstick coating layered on top is the critical unknown: Rachael Ray does not publicly specify whether it contains Teflon-type coating (Teflon), ceramic, or proprietary polymer, which directly determines safety hazards around thermal breakdown and PFAS exposure.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rachael Ray cookware marketing emphasizes durability and ease of cleaning but provides no transparency regarding nonstick chemistry, PFAS content, or thermal stability thresholds. The brand has not published third-party certifications (such as GOTS, OEKO-TEX for textiles, or NSF for cookware) and maintains no public commitment to PFAS-free manufacturing. No significant recalls or health controversies specific to Rachael Ray cookware are documented in FDA or CPSC databases, but the absence of disclosure is itself a compliance gap given current nonstick industry standards.

How it compares in its category

Hard anodized aluminum nonstick skillets occupy the mid-market segment; Rachael Ray pricing and construction are typical for this category. Competitors such as Calphalon and T-fal offer similar hard anodized bases but also fail to disclose PFAS status consistently; premium brands like GreenPan and Our Place explicitly market ceramic or Teflon-type coating-free coatings. The lack of transparency is industry-wide but does not excuse individual brands from clearer labeling, making this product neither exceptional nor uniquely problematic in its class.

If you buy it

Keep heat below medium-high to minimize risk of nonstick coating degradation and potential fume release (thermal threshold depends on the unspecified coating type). Hand wash rather than use dishwasher to extend coating life and reduce exposure to coating particles. Replace the skillet if the nonstick surface visibly peels, flakes, or becomes sticky, as these are signs of breakdown. Store with a protective liner between stacked pans to prevent scratching, which can compromise the anodized seal and coating integrity.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rachael Ray has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Nonstick Skillets

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

GreenPan

Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

ceramic nonstick coating

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade58Good
🍂

Ceramic coating degradation and peeling

High concern

20
🔩

Aluminum leaching from base metal

Limited concern

70
🍂

Coating adhesion loss and metal exposure

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern; ceramic nonstick avoids Teflon-type coating, but no independent lab confirmation.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Set

GreenPan

Rio Ceramic Set

ceramic non-stick coating

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🍂

Ceramic coating degradation and flaking

Limited concern

70

Lower concern cookware; ceramic coating cuts PFAS risk versus traditional Teflon-family coating nonstick.

Risky category by default

Calphalon Ceramic Nonstick Frying Pan 12"

Calphalon

Ceramic Nonstick Frying Pan 12"

ceramic nonstick coating

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade54Good

Ceramic coating degradation over time

High concern

20
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70

Lower concern choice; ceramic avoids traditional Teflon-family coating without Calphalon PFAS commitment.

Risky category by default

More nonstick skillets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.