PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall53/ 100Good
Reformation Campo Bikini Bottom

Reformation · Swimwear

Reformation Campo Bikini Bottom

Good

Lower concern; basic bikini bottom with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict · SkipRecycled nylon swimwear with no established chemical hazards; lower PFAS concern and standard construction reduce risk profile.

This recycled nylon swimwear piece shows no documented PFAS-heavy coatings or treatments. Reformation does not publicly disclose whether water-resistant finishes on swimwear contain PFAS, and no third-party environmental certifications are claimed.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Recycled nylon (primary); standard swimwear construction

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Reformation Campo Bikini Bottom is made of, ingredients and materials

The Campo Bikini Bottom is constructed from recycled nylon, a synthetic polymer derived from post-consumer or post-industrial waste streams. Recycled nylon retains the same chemical backbone as virgin nylon but avoids the energy-intensive polymerization step. Nylon itself is stable in normal use and does not leach monomers or plasticizers into skin or water under typical swimming conditions. The material's durability and low moisture absorption make it suitable for repeated wet/dry cycling without degradation that would release breakdown products.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⏳

Spandex/elastane sensitization and degradation

Spandex components in swimwear elastic can degrade under UV and chlorine exposure, potentially releasing oligomers. Reformation does not publicly specify elastane source or treatment; risk is typical for the product category but not elevated for this brand.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fiber

All nylon swimwear sheds microfibers when washed. Recycled nylon does not shed more than virgin nylon, but the environmental impact of repeated washing remains. This is a water-pollution concern, not a direct health hazard to the wearer.

70/ 100
⚠️

Allergic contact dermatitis from dyes or residual surfactants

Some individuals report sensitivity to synthetic dyes or laundry-detergent residues in new swimwear. Pre-washing in plain water mitigates risk; no specific allergen profile is documented for this product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No public reports of azo-dye contamination or heavy-metal pigment use in Reformation swimwear. Standard commercial nylon bikini bottoms rarely disclose dye chemistry, but no specific safety alert exists for this product.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public disclosure of formaldehyde-resin finishes or wrinkle-resistance treatments on the Campo bottom. Nylon rarely requires such finishes, and no recall or testing alert has targeted Reformation swimwear on this front.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Reformation has built its brand identity on sustainability and transparency, publishing annual impact reports and material sourcing disclosures. However, the brand has not made explicit public commitments to PFAS avoidance or third-party chemical testing for its swimwear line, and maintains a generally silent stance on PFAS "forever chemicals". No recalls or documented chemical safety controversies specific to Reformation swimwear have been established in public records. The use of recycled nylon aligns with the brand's circular-economy positioning but does not inherently guarantee absence of legacy contaminants in feedstock.

How it compares in its category

Recycled nylon swimwear sits in the middle-to-upper tier of conventional swimwear safety. Most mass-market bikini bottoms use virgin nylon or nylon-spandex blends with minimal disclosure; Reformation's recycled material choice is a transparency signal but not a guaranteed safety advantage. Natural-fiber swimwear (wool, cotton blends) exists but is uncommon and may require higher maintenance. The Campo's construction appears standard for the price point, with no evidence of unusual dyes, finishes, or coatings that would elevate chemical risk.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water before first wear to remove any residual dyes or finishing agents from manufacturing. Cold-water rinses after saltwater or chlorinated swimming extend fabric life and prevent salt/chlorine buildup that can degrade fibers over years. Air-dry away from direct heat or sunlight; avoid machine dryers and hot water, which accelerate nylon breakdown and polymer chain scission. Replace the bottom if elastic degrades, seams separate, or the fabric develops visible brittleness, as these are signs of structural failure rather than chemical contamination but indicate end of usable life.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reformation has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.