PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall47/ 100Poor
Reiss Women's Imogen Hardware-Strap Cut-Out Swimsuit

Reiss · Swimwear

Reiss Women's Imogen Hardware-Strap Cut-Out Swimsuit

Good

Standard swimwear carries low PFAS concern absent chemical treatments.

Verdict · SkipStandard nylon-polyester swimwear with no documented hazards; PFAS profile acceptable; routine care mitigates minor leaching risk.

Basic cut-out swimsuit uses standard synthetic fabrics. Reiss makes no PFAS claims; fashion swimwear typically avoids water-repellent finishes.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon/polyester blend (standard swimwear)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Reiss Women's Imogen Hardware-Strap is made of, ingredients and materials

This swimsuit is a nylon-polyester blend, the industry standard for swimwear elasticity and durability. Nylon and polyester are synthetic polymers that do not naturally leach chemicals into skin or water during normal wear. The hardware (straps, closures) introduces potential for nickel or other metal allergens, though this is common across branded swimwear and rarely a concern for non-allergic wearers. Dyes used in swimwear fabrics can include azo compounds, though reputable brands like Reiss typically source from suppliers meeting EU or California standards that restrict the most hazardous azo dyes.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and color fastness

Synthetic swimwear relies on azo or reactive dyes. Reiss does not disclose dye restrictions or third-party testing. Risk is low if sourced from regulated suppliers (EU, US) but unverified. Dye leaching increases slightly with sweat, chlorine, or heat; mitigated by immediate rinsing and cool-water care.

70/ 100
⚠️

Nickel or metal allergens in hardware

Straps and closures introduce metal components with unknown coating or alloy composition. Non-nickel plating is standard in branded swimwear but not certified here. Risk is limited to individuals with contact dermatitis; general population exposure is negligible during brief water immersion.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

All synthetic fiber swimwear sheds microfibers during washing and wear. Nylon and polyester contribute to ocean microplastic pollution; this is an environmental rather than personal-health hazard. Use of a microfiber-capture wash bag reduces shed volume by 80-90% per published studies.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Fiber degradation and elastane breakdown

No specific defects or premature degradation reported for Reiss swimwear. Nylon-polyester blends typically remain functional for 50-100 wears if cared for properly. Risk of rapid breakdown (causing skin irritation from raw fibers) is low absent manufacturing defect.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist treatments are used in some textile manufacturing but are rare in premium swimwear, where elasticity is prioritized. No reports link Reiss swimwear to formaldehyde exposure. If present, levels would dissipate during first washes.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Reiss is a UK-based luxury fashion brand with no public chemical-safety disclosures, certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX), or documented product recalls related to swimwear. The brand does not publish supply-chain or material-sourcing transparency reports. Absence of disclosure does not indicate hazard; it reflects typical practice among mid-to-premium fashion brands that prioritize marketing over regulatory transparency. No established safety controversies or hazard incidents are on record for Reiss swimwear.

How it compares in its category

Nylon-polyester blends are the norm for competitive and fashion swimwear, making this product materially typical. Brands with higher transparency (e.g., Patagonia, Girlfriend Collective) provide third-party certifications; Reiss does not, placing it in the silent-disclosure majority. The hardware-strap design introduces no elevated risk compared to other structured swimwear; metal hardware is universal. Price point suggests domestic quality control comparable to mid-tier competitors like J.Crew or Banana Republic swimwear.

If you buy it

Rinse the swimsuit in fresh water immediately after pool or saltwater use to remove chlorine and salt, which can degrade elasticity and accelerate dye leaching. Air-dry flat or on a hanger, never in direct sunlight for extended periods (UV breaks down synthetic fibers). Inspect hardware seams annually for corrosion or nickel discoloration; if visible deterioration occurs, replacement is advisable. Wash by hand in cool water with mild detergent; avoid hot water, bleach, and machine drying, which accelerate material breakdown and dye migration.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reiss has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.