PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall62/ 100Good
Rubbermaid Lunchblox Entrée Kit, Green

Rubbermaid · Lunch Boxes

Rubbermaid Lunchblox Entrée Kit, Green

Good

Lower concern food container; no PFAS-typical triggers identified.

Verdict · BuyPolypropylene food container with no reported chemical leaching or degradation issues; silicone seals lower seal-failure risk; lower PFAS concern and no brand controversies on record.

Rubbermaid Lunchblox uses polypropylene plastic and silicone, neither materials typically associated with PFAS. Brand makes no PFAS claims or disclosures; no public lab testing found.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Polypropylene (PP) plastic container with silicone seals

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Rubbermaid Lunchblox Entrée Kit, Green is made of, ingredients and materials

The Lunchblox Entrée Kit uses polypropylene (PP, plastic #5), a thermoplastic polymer chosen for food storage because it resists moisture, is dishwasher-safe, and does not readily leach chemicals at normal use temperatures. Silicone seals (typically FDA-compliant food-grade silicone) provide an airtight barrier without relying on Teflon-type coating or problematic adhesives. Polypropylene has no reported leaching of BPA, BPS, or phthalates in normal food-contact use, making it one of the more chemically inert single-use plastics.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Polypropylene can shed microparticles if scratched, cracked, or exposed to prolonged heat and mechanical stress. Risk is minimized by careful handling and replacement of visibly damaged containers; heating above manufacturer limits increases degradation risk.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100
⏳

Silicone seal degradation and microbial growth

Silicone seals can degrade, discolor, or harbor bacteria if not cleaned thoroughly after each use or if stored wet. Inspect seals regularly and replace the container if seals no longer seal airtight or show permanent discoloration.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Polypropylene does not contain BPA, BPS, or phthalates as manufacturing additives; no leaching reported in normal food contact or after washing. No recalls or independent testing alerts on record for this product.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Polypropylene food containers are not typically colored with lead or cadmium pigments under current FDA food-contact regulations. No specific recalls or safety warnings for Rubbermaid Lunchblox pigmentation on record.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Off-gassing or volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Polypropylene has minimal VOC off-gassing compared to other plastics; any slight odor from new containers typically dissipates within days of use and does not indicate a safety concern.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Rubbermaid (Newell Brands) does not publicly disclose detailed PFAS statements for individual products, but the company has faced no significant recalls or regulatory actions related to chemical leaching from Lunchblox containers. The product line has been in market for over a decade without documented safety incidents tied to material degradation or contaminant migration. Rubbermaid maintains FDA compliance for food-contact plastics but does not prominently advertise chemical testing results on consumer-facing materials.

How it compares in its category

Polypropylene food containers like Lunchblox occupy a middle tier of chemical safety in the lunch-kit market, safer than older polycarbonate (which contains BPA) and PVC, but less extensively third-party tested than some specialty brands (e.g., Pyrex glass or stainless steel alternatives). Silicone seals are standard across mid-range reusable containers and carry lower leaching risk than traditional rubber gaskets. The Lunchblox line's multi-compartment design and durability position it as a common school and office choice with no specific safety red flags versus comparable polypropylene competitors.

If you buy it

Avoid heating polypropylene above 100 degrees Celsius (212 Fahrenheit); hand-wash or use the top rack of the dishwasher to extend seal life and reduce thermal stress to the plastic. Replace containers if seals become loose, brittle, or discolored, as degraded silicone seals can fail to prevent leakage and microbial growth. Do not use with hot liquids or fatty foods at high temperature; room-temperature or gently warmed foods are safest. Inspect for cracks or stress marks periodically; intact plastic is the baseline for food safety.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rubbermaid has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Snapware Meal Box Glass

Snapware

Meal Box Glass

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • borosilicate glass
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Oxo Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

OXO

Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
  • Lid/gasket polymer leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.