PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Salomon Men's Crosstrak Powder Waterproof

Salomon · Waterproof Boots

Salomon Men's Crosstrak Powder Waterproof

Bad

Avoid until Salomon discloses its water-repellent coating chemistry or PFAS-free status.

Verdict: SkipPolyester boot with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry presents PFAS uncertainty; buy only if you commit to regular cleaning and accept durability limits of synthetic coatings.

Salomon doesn't disclose the PFAS status of this shoe's waterproof treatment. Outdoor apparel brands historically rely on PFAS-based water-repellent coating, though alternatives now exist. Without transparency or verification, PFAS risk is typical.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with waterproof water-repellent coating (unspecified chemistry)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and re-exposure

Polyester with unspecified water-repellent coating formulation will lose water-beading performance within 1-2 seasons. As the coating wears, consumers may re-treat with similar or unknown-chemistry sprays, prolonging potential exposure to fluorinated or other biocides without transparency.

20/ 100
🫧

Polyester fiber microplastic shedding

Polyester uppers shed microfibers during wear and washing, especially after the water-repellent coating begins to flake or crack. Risk is elevated in boot heels and toe areas where abrasion is highest; washing in a machine accelerates this process.

70/ 100
💨

Adhesive and solvent off-gassing from glued seams

Waterproof boots use polyurethane or epoxy adhesives to seal seams and bond materials. New boots may off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for days to weeks; airing outdoors before wearing reduces inhalation risk.

70/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Salomon has not confirmed PFAS-free status of its water-repellent coating. Industry-wide, most polyester waterproof coatings contain long-chain PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, or newer 'GenX' alternatives). This product's specific chemistry is unknown, requiring the separate PFAS assessment (20/100 safety) already noted.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or public testing results document formaldehyde resin treatment or antimony catalyst residues in Salomon boots. Standard polyester production may involve these inputs, but no evidence of unsafe levels in finished footwear has been reported for this brand.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Salomon's Crosstrak Powder uses polyester uppers with a proprietary waterproof water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating of unspecified chemistry. The polyester itself is stable, but the water-repellent coating finish is the actual barrier against water ingress, and its durability and chemical safety depend entirely on the formulation, which Salomon has not publicly disclosed. Over time, water-repellent coating coatings degrade from friction, UV exposure, and washing, requiring retreatment or replacement of the boot's protective layer.

The brand's record and disclosure

Salomon has not published a clear public commitment to PFAS-free waterproofing or disclosed the chemistry of its water-repellent coating coatings. The brand does not appear on major environmental certifications (Bluesign, GOTS, or OEKO-TEX) specifically for chemical transparency. Salomon remains largely silent on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance use across its product lines, a significant gap for a company selling water-protective gear where fluorinated finishes are industry standard.

How it compares in its category

Many competing waterproof boots (Merrell, La Sportiva, some KEEN models) now disclose PFAS-free or low-PFAS water-repellent coating options or hold third-party certifications. Salomon's lack of transparency puts this model at a disadvantage against brands offering wax, silicone, or other non-fluorinated water barriers. Within Salomon's own range, there is no published differentiation between water-repellent coating formulations across models, making selection harder for informed consumers.

If you buy it

Expect the water-repellent coating to remain effective for 1-2 seasons of regular hiking before water starts beading less reliably. Clean the boots with plain water and a soft brush after each muddy outing to avoid salt, dirt, and organic buildup that degrades coatings faster. Do not machine wash or use harsh detergents; apply a re-water-repellent coating spray (preferably PFAS-free branded products) annually or when beading fails. Replace the boot when the sole separates or the upper loses structural integrity, not just when water resistance declines.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Salomon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof boots grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.