PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Salomon Men's X Ultra Forces Mid GTX Boots

Salomon · Waterproof Boots

Salomon Men's X Ultra Forces Mid GTX Boots

Bad

GTX waterproofing likely contains legacy PFAS. Salomon uncommitted.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof boots with likely legacy PFAS in GTX membrane; non-PFAS hazards minimal but Gore-Tex durability and synthetic upper breakdown warrant informed maintenance.

These boots use Gore-Tex for waterproofing, a technology historically dependent on PFAS chemistry. Salomon doesn't disclose PFAS use or claim PFAS-free status. Without testing or brand commitment, assume elevated PFAS concern.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic textile upper with GTX (Gore-Tex) membrane waterproofing

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating membrane microfiber shedding

Gore-Tex Teflon-type coating film can degrade and shed microfibers during prolonged use, especially if flexed repeatedly in the ankle area. Long-term inhalation or ingestion risk is low under normal wear, but heavy use over years combined with physical breakdown of the laminate increases shed rates.

70/ 100
💨

Synthetic upper off-gassing (VOC)

New synthetic polyester/nylon uppers may emit volatile organic compounds (solvents from dyeing and adhesives) in the first few weeks of wear, particularly if stored in warm conditions. This is typical for the category; off-gassing is usually mild and dissipates after airing out.

70/ 100
♾️

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) fluorochemical content

The factory water-repellent coating treatment on the synthetic upper likely contains short- or long-chain fluorinated compounds to achieve water beading. While direct skin absorption is minimal during wear, washing releases these into wastewater; replacement water-repellent coating products labeled PFOA-free or fluorine-free are available.

20/ 100
💨

Adhesive residues and off-gassing

Laminating the Gore-Tex membrane to the synthetic upper requires polyurethane or polyether-based adhesives; these can off-gas at low levels over the boot's lifetime, especially if stored in warm conditions. Proper airing before and after wear reduces exposure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester upper

Synthetic textile uppers in hiking boots are typically dyed with azo dyes; Salomon does not disclose restricted azo dye use, but the product is not known to have failed azo dye compliance testing. EU REACH and ZDHC standards generally limit the most hazardous azo compounds, though Salomon's compliance posture is not fully transparent.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These boots use a synthetic textile upper (typically polyester or nylon blend) bonded to a Gore-Tex waterproof-breathable membrane, which is a laminated Teflon-type coating film. The Gore-Tex layer itself historically required PFAS-based surfactants and water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) chemistry to function; while Gore-Tex manufacturing has improved, legacy formulations contained long-chain PFAS. The synthetic materials themselves (polyester, nylon, adhesives) do not present acute leaching risks during normal wear, but degradation of the membrane over years can release microfibers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Salomon has not published a detailed chemical disclosure statement or PFAS phase-out commitment as of available public records. The brand is owned by Amer Sports (now Amer Sports Corporation), which has made minimal public commitments to PFAS elimination in footwear. Salomon's GTX models use standard Gore-Tex licenses and do not highlight alternative waterproofing. No major recalls or contamination incidents specific to this boot model are on record.

How it compares in its category

Most premium waterproof hiking boots in this segment (Merrell, Keen, La Sportiva) similarly rely on Gore-Tex or equivalent Teflon-type coating membranes, making PFAS exposure a category-wide issue rather than Salomon-specific. A small number of brands (Patagonia, some outdoor labels) now use PFOA-free or Teflon-type coating-free membranes, but these are the exception. Salomon's X Ultra line is mid-range in price and durability; boots at this tier rarely disclose water-repellent coating chemistry or offer greener alternatives as standard.

If you buy it

Care for the synthetic upper by rinsing mud off promptly and air-drying away from heat; do not machine wash or expose to hot water, which can degrade the GTX bond. Avoid prolonged contact with direct sunlight, which degrades polyester fibers over 3-5 years of heavy use. Reapply non-fluorinated water-repellent coating (such as paraffin or silicone-based products) every 12-18 months to maintain water beading. If the upper develops delamination, creasing cracks, or the sole separates, replacement is more practical than repair.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Salomon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof boots grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.