PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Salomon Men's X Ultra Snowpilot Waterproof Hiking Boots

Salomon · Waterproof Boots

Salomon Men's X Ultra Snowpilot Waterproof Hiking Boots

Bad

Waterproof hiking boots likely treated with legacy PFAS. Salomon silent.

Verdict: SkipPFAS waterproofing is the primary concern; other textile hazards are standard for the category. Salomon's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry and lack of PFAS-free alternatives warrant cautious purchase with extended laundering before wear.

These boots use waterproof synthetic uppers and membranes typical of technical hiking boots, historically reliant on PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings. Salomon makes no statement on PFAS use, phaseout, or alternatives. No testing or certifications exist.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic upper with water-repellent coating-treated waterproof membrane/lining

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof hiking boots are historically treated with fluorinated water-repellent coating compounds. Salomon does not disclose whether this model uses legacy or alternative chemistry. PFAS bioacculates and is detected in human blood; prolonged skin contact and hand-washing of treated gear contribute cumulative exposure.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

Polyester and nylon uppers may be dyed with azo colorants, some of which are restricted in EU but permitted elsewhere. No brand-specific testing data is available for the X Ultra. Risk is low during normal wear but increases with heavy sweating and direct skin contact.

70/ 100
💨

Polyurethane lining off-gassing

Waterproof membranes (polyurethane-based) can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), especially during the first weeks of use and with heat exposure. This is not acute but may cause mild respiratory or odor irritation in enclosed spaces. Airing boots outdoors before wear reduces initial off-gassing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic hiking boots typically avoid formaldehyde resins, which are more common in cotton apparel. No evidence suggests their use in the X Ultra. Technical footwear usually employs polyurethane or acrylic binders instead.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Polyester fibers can contain antimony as a catalyst residue if not adequately purged. Industry best-practice purging has reduced this risk significantly. No recalls or testing data specific to Salomon boots indicate this is a concern for this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The X Ultra Snowpilot uses a synthetic upper (likely polyester or nylon blend) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating on the exterior and a waterproof membrane lining. water-repellent coating treatments on outdoor footwear are historically based on fluorinated compounds (legacy PFAS), which provide exceptional water shedding but persist in the environment and bioaccumulate. The lining membrane itself is typically polyurethane, which is stable under normal use but can off-gas volatile organic compounds during manufacturing and initial wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Salomon, owned by Amer Sports, has not publicly committed to PFAS phase-out or disclosed whether the X Ultra line uses fluorinated or fluorine-free water-repellent coating. The brand does not publish chemical composition or supplier audits for waterproofing treatments. No major recalls or chemical safety incidents have been documented for this specific model. This silence contrasts with competitors (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) who have announced PFAS reduction roadmaps.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof hiking boots across the industry rely on water-repellent coating coatings; legacy PFAS-based versions remain the default for performance, cost, and durability. Salomon's lack of transparency places it at the lower end of best-practice disclosure but within the industry norm for technical footwear. Boots marketed as PFAS-free (e.g., some models from Patagonia or Allbirds) exist but are less common in high-performance winter hiking segments. Price and performance specs of the X Ultra are competitive; the trade-off is unknown chemical inputs.

If you buy it

Wash the boots in cool water with mild detergent before first wear to reduce residual water-repellent coating and polyurethane off-gassing. Avoid machine drying or direct heat above 50°C, as this can degrade the membrane and accelerate coating breakdown. Reapply water-repellent coating every 50-100 hours of use or annually; choose fluorine-free alternatives (silicone-based) when replacing. Replace boots if the upper seams fail, lining tears, or waterproofing becomes unreliable, as repair of membrane integrity is rarely economical.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Salomon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof boots grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.