PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall52/ 100Good
BergHOFF Leo Balance Smart Seal Food Container

Smart Seal · Lunch Boxes

BergHOFF Leo Balance Smart Seal Food Container

Good

Skip until brand discloses lid and seal material composition.

Verdict · Buy with careBPA/BPS and phthalate risk unconfirmed; lid-seal composition undisclosed; usable with caution pending brand transparency on closure materials.

BergHOFF's Leo Balance container lacks public material disclosure for the lid and sealing layer. Food container lids often use problematic coatings; confirmation needed before purchase.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Plastic container, lid material unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What BergHOFF Leo Balance Smart Seal Food is made of, ingredients and materials

The container body is plastic, but the specific resin type (polypropylene, polycarbonate, copolyester, etc.) is not stated in available product information. The lid material and seal composition are entirely unspecified, which is a significant gap because lids and seals in food-storage containers often contain different polymers or elastomers than the body, and may leach differently under temperature stress. Without resin identification, BPA/BPS and phthalate risk cannot be ruled out.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

The resin type is not disclosed. If the body or lid contains polycarbonate or certain copolyesters, BPA or BPS may leach into food, especially when warm or acidic. No brand statement confirms BPA-free status.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

Flexible seal materials and some plastic formulations may contain phthalates to improve flexibility. Without specification of the seal material (silicone, rubber, plasticized PVC, or other), this hazard cannot be ruled out.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⛏️

Lid and seal material leaching

Food-storage lid seals are a known source of migration in laboratory studies, particularly when seals are made from non-food-grade elastomers or contain additives. This product's lid composition is entirely unspecified, making assessment impossible.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

No specific degradation issues or recalls are on record for this brand. However, if the lid seal is lower-quality elastomer or the container body is thin, mechanical wear or UV exposure could shed particles over time. Inspect regularly for surface cracks or flaking.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Coating or additive off-gassing

No coating is named in product information, so volatile organic compound risk is not established. Standard plastic food containers typically do not require surface coatings, but unconfirmed manufacturing details prevent definitive assessment.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

BergHOFF and Smart Seal branding is associated with kitchen products, but public disclosure of material composition, migration testing, or certification (FDA, BPA-free claims, third-party testing) is not on record for this specific product line. No major recalls or established safety controversies are documented. The brand has not publicly committed to PFAS-free manufacturing or provided lid-seal material specifications, which limits independent safety verification.

How it compares in its category

Food-storage containers typically range from low-concern (glass, stainless steel, certified BPA-free polypropylene with transparent labeling) to higher-concern (polycarbonate with BPA, unlabeled plastics with unknown additives). This product occupies a middle zone, marketed as a 'smart seal' system but lacking the transparency of leading brands (e.g., OXO Good Grips, Pyrex, Rubbermaid) that openly publish material specs and third-party certifications. The sealed design is a selling point for freshness but does not inherently reduce chemical leaching risk.

If you buy it

Do not use with hot or warm foods; store only room-temperature or cold items to minimize plastic leaching. Avoid microwaving unless the lid is explicitly labeled microwave-safe (not confirmed here). Replace the container if the lid seal becomes loose, discolored, or cracked, as degraded seals may leach faster. Request material specification and BPA/BPS status from the retailer or brand before purchase; if unavailable, consider switching to a brand with published safety data.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Smart Seal has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Snapware Meal Box Glass

Snapware

Meal Box Glass

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • borosilicate glass
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Oxo Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

OXO

Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
  • Lid/gasket polymer leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.