PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
PG40 Artificial Turf

Sportmaster · Artificial Turf

PG40 Artificial Turf

Poor

Synthetic turf backing and adhesives often use PFAS; Sportmaster does not disclose.

Verdict: SkipPE/PP fibers are chemically stable, but undisclosed backing/adhesive composition and silent PFAS stance create accountability gap; requires vendor transparency before confident recommendation.

PG40 turf composition and waterproofing treatments lack public disclosure from Sportmaster. Synthetic turf backing and adhesives commonly contain PFAS without independent testing available.

The safe swap

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyethylene or polypropylene fibers with unspecified backing/adhesive coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from adhesive/backing

Synthetic turf backings and adhesives commonly off-gas in the first weeks to months after installation. Sportmaster's silence on adhesive type makes it impossible to assess VOC load; polyurethane and PVC-based systems carry higher risk than latex, but without disclosure, the grade remains 'possible' rather than established.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fiber wear

PE and PP fibers in artificial turf shed microplastics over time through foot traffic and weather exposure. This is a documented phenomenon in the category and affects all synthetic turf; PG40 offers no material or design features to reduce shedding compared to industry norms.

45/ 100

Degradation of backing/adhesive over time and UV exposure

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

🔥

Flame retardants

Many artificial turfs are treated with flame retardants to meet safety codes; Sportmaster does not disclose whether PG40 carries such a treatment, so hazard status cannot be assessed. If present, common flame retardants include halogenated or organophosphate compounds with potential toxicological concerns, but no specific information is available for this product.

Source: EPA
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Synthetic turf fibers are often colored with organic or inorganic dyes. No specific testing or disclosure from Sportmaster is on record regarding cadmium, lead, or other heavy metals in PG40 colorants; the industry standard is largely unregulated in this category.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

PG40 uses polyethylene or polypropylene fibers, which are relatively inert plastics and do not leach monomers under normal use conditions. The critical unknown is the backing and adhesive system: synthetic turf backings often use polyurethane, PVC, or latex, each with different chemical profiles. Without specification from Sportmaster, you cannot assess whether the adhesive contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or, critically, PFAS-based stain/water repellents commonly used in turf products for durability.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sportmaster does not publicly disclose material composition, adhesive chemistry, or PFAS use in the PG40 product line. No third-party certifications (such as GreenGuard or OEKO-TEX) are on record for this product. The company's silence on these details is the primary concern; competitors in the artificial turf space increasingly publish full material declarations in response to PFAS scrutiny, and Sportmaster's absence of such transparency suggests either lack of testing or unwillingness to share findings.

How it compares in its category

Artificial turf as a category carries inherent PFAS risk in backing and adhesives, which most manufacturers have not adequately addressed. PG40 occupies the mid-market segment without distinguishing features (no published environmental certifications or PFAS-free claims). Products from manufacturers like Heatherwick or Field Turf that publish detailed material safety data and third-party testing offer greater transparency, though at higher cost. Natural grass or recycled-content alternatives eliminate the PFAS/adhesive concern entirely but require more maintenance.

If you buy it

Request full material specification and adhesive ingredient disclosure from Sportmaster before installation; many suppliers will push back, which is itself a red flag. During installation, ensure adequate ventilation in the work area to minimize inhalation of any adhesive VOCs. Avoid high-temperature applications (e.g., in direct sun reflection from nearby structures) that could degrade the backing and increase particle or chemical release. Plan for replacement within 8-10 years; aging turf shows increased shedding and backing degradation, at which point the adhesive/backing chemicals may mobilize more readily.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sportmaster has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Artificial Turf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

Polypropylene (PP) astroturf

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade45Poor
💨

VOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding

High concern

20
⚠️

Backing adhesive failure and fiber separation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Infill contamination (if rubber granules used)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; polypropylene rarely requires PFAS, but no brand disclosure on treatments.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

AstroTurf

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fibers

Moderate concern

45
⛏️

Leaching from backing polymers or adhesives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Infill contamination (if sand or crumb used)

Limited concern

70

Wait for brand to disclose turf composition; synthetic turf historically may use PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Multi Sport Turf

Sportmaster

Multi Sport Turf

synthetic turf (polyethylene/polypropylene fibers, infill material unspecified)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade49Poor
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed infill composition and leachates

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Fiber degradation and microplastic generation

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound off-gassing during installation

Limited concern

70

Insufficient brand disclosure.

Risky category by default

More artificial turf grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.