PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall39/ 100Poor
Summersalt DreamDrape Sidestroke

Summersalt · Swimwear

Summersalt DreamDrape Sidestroke

Good

Lower PFAS concern for untreated natural-fiber apparel; no finish mentioned.

Verdict · SkipCotton-linen blend with no water-repellent finish carries lower concern for chemical hazard; brand transparency is limited but material choice has not been linked to PFAS.

Summersalt's DreamDrape appears unfinished cotton or cotton blend with no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant treatment. Without evidence of Teflon-family coating coatings or water-repellent coating chemistry, risk is lower.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cotton/linen blend fabric (standard weave)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Summersalt DreamDrape Sidestroke is made of, ingredients and materials

The DreamDrape Sidestroke is constructed from a cotton-linen blend in standard weave, meaning no specialized coatings or finishes are applied to enhance water resistance or durability. This is significant because untreated natural fibers do not require the chemical treatments (particularly water-repellent coating finishes) that introduce PFAS or other persistent hazards into textiles. The material will absorb water readily and dry more slowly than synthetic alternatives, but it avoids the chemical load entirely.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Cotton and linen textiles may be treated with formaldehyde-based dyes or sizing agents during manufacturing. No information available on Summersalt's dye suppliers or finishing standards; untreated natural fibers typically have lower residual formaldehyde than synthetic-blend swimwear, but pre-wash rinsing is prudent.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Natural-fiber swimwear can use azo dyes, which are restricted in some jurisdictions but still employed globally. Without certification (e.g., OEKO-TEX or GOTS), no assurance exists that this product avoids restricted azo compounds or heavy metals in pigments. Pre-purchase color testing by independent labs is not standard for retail swimwear.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
⏳

Elastane degradation and leaching

Swimwear blends typically include spandex (elastane) for stretch. Under chlorine, salt water, and UV exposure, elastane can degrade and release oligomers; natural fibers do not shed microplastics, but the spandex component may. No product-specific data on elastane percentage or composition is disclosed.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mildew and bacterial growth if stored wet

Cotton-linen blends retain moisture longer than synthetic alternatives and are more prone to microbial colonization if left damp. This is a use-phase risk, not a manufacturing hazard, but poor care can create conditions for mold toxins or odor-causing bacteria within weeks.

45/ 100
🎨

Dye bleeding and color fastness under sun/chlorine

Natural-fiber swimwear may exhibit faster color fading and dye migration than synthetic swimwear, particularly if dyes are not fully fixed. Repeated chlorine or saltwater exposure can cause dyes to leach into skin or pool water; no color-fastness data for this specific product is available.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Summersalt has not publicly disclosed detailed chemical composition, testing protocols, or third-party certifications for the DreamDrape line. The brand's silence on PFAS stance suggests no proactive commitment to water-repellent-free production, though the absence of a performance finish on this particular style may be circumstantial rather than principled. No established recalls or safety controversies specific to Summersalt swimwear are on record. The lack of transparency is a minor concern, but the material choice itself sidesteps the worst offenders.

How it compares in its category

Most competitive swimwear uses nylon, polyester, or elastane with applied water-repellent coatings to reduce drying time and improve durability. The DreamDrape's untreated natural-fiber construction is unusual and lower-risk chemically, though it sacrifices quick-dry performance. Comparable alternatives (organic cotton swimwear or GOTS-certified brands) typically cost more and offer explicit certifications; Summersalt's positioning is mid-market without equivalent third-party verification.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with mild detergent before first wear to remove any finishing residues from manufacturing. Air dry completely after each use to prevent mildew in the blend; do not machine dry, which risks shrinkage and fabric stress. Expect slower drying than synthetic swimwear and potential for color fading with UV exposure over time. Check seams and elastic annually for degradation, as natural fibers weaken faster than synthetic blends under chlorine and sun.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Summersalt has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.