PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
The North Face Women's VECTIV Fastpack Insulated Waterproof Hiking Boots

The North Face · Waterproof Boots

The North Face Women's VECTIV Fastpack Insulated Waterproof Hiking Boots

Bad

Skip if PFAS concerns you. Industry waterproof treatments pose risk.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof boots carry likely PFAS from water-repellent coating treatment; other hazard profile is standard. Buy only if PFAS risk acceptable; prioritize maintenance.

The North Face doesn't disclose PFAS in these boots. Waterproof hiking boots typically rely on water-repellent coating coatings, historically PFAS-based, though alternatives exist. Without material specifications or testing, PFAS presence can't be ruled out.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic uppers with waterproof membrane and water-repellent coating-treated fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof synthetic boots almost universally use fluorocarbon water-repellent coating unless explicitly marketed otherwise. The North Face has not confirmed PFAS-free status, making PFAS exposure from this product probable during wear and care.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic uppers

Polyester or nylon uppers may be dyed with azo compounds (regulated but not banned in footwear). Carcinogenic aromatic amines are unlikely in finished North Face products due to industry standards, but dye migration to skin from abrasion or sweat is theoretically possible with poor quality control.

70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Synthetic textiles can retain trace chromium, cadmium, or lead if dye suppliers are not vetted. The North Face operates with responsible sourcing protocols, making this a low-probability hazard, but no independent testing of VECTIV Fastpack materials is publicly available.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some water-repellent coating treatments historically incorporated formaldehyde as a binder, though modern systems have largely phased this out. The North Face does not specify whether VECTIV uses formaldehyde-free water-repellent coating, leaving low residual risk.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Adhesive off-gassing (VOC)

Glued seams and sole attachment in modern waterproof boots are typically low-VOC, and North Face manufacturing meets standard footwear safety thresholds. No odor complaints or off-gassing reports specific to this model are documented.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

VECTIV Fastpack uppers are synthetic (likely polyester or nylon blend) with a waterproof membrane interior and water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) surface coating. The water-repellent coating treatment is the primary chemical exposure vector: The North Face does not publicly disclose whether their water-repellent coating uses PFAS-based formulations (legacy fluorocarbon chemistry) or PFAS-free alternatives. Synthetic uppers themselves carry minimal inherent toxicity, but the waterproof system's composition is opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has published sustainability commitments but remains silent on PFAS phase-out timelines or which products use PFAS-free water-repellent coating. The company has not earned third-party certifications (e.g., GOTS, Bluesign) that would guarantee synthetic treatment safety. No major recalls or reported contamination events for this specific model are on record. Brand transparency on chemical inputs is below leaders like Patagonia and Arc'teryx.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream waterproof hiking boots (Merrell, Salomon, Columbia) use similar synthetic-plus-water-repellent coating construction with equivalent PFAS uncertainty. Premium brands (Scarpa, La Sportiva) rarely disclose water-repellent coating chemistry either; PFAS-transparent alternatives are niche (some REI Co-op models, select Danner lines using wax or silicone water-repellent coating). This product is typical for its market tier and price point, neither worse nor better on chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Wash boots with cool water only; hot water can degrade the waterproof membrane and potentially mobilize residual treatment chemicals. Reapply water-repellent coating annually using a commercial product (read its label for PFAS status if concerned). Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or UV. Replace when tread wears or waterproofing fails visibly, typically 18-24 months of regular use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof boots grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.