PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall62/ 100Good
Tranquility Personal Care Pads 13.5" x 6.5", 96/Case

Tranquility · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Tranquility Personal Care Pads 13.5" x 6.5", 96/Case

Good

Standard materials suggest lower PFAS risk; no treatment evident.

Verdict · BuyStandard absorbent pad with cellulose core and no established safety red flags. Low PFAS concern and typical formulation pose minimal consumer risk.

These pads use standard cellulose and wood pulp materials common in absorption products. No PFAS claims exist, but materials carry lower inherent risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Cellulose, wood pulp, absorbent core, adhesives

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Tranquility Personal Care 6.5", 96/Case is made of, ingredients and materials

Tranquility pads use cellulose and wood pulp as the absorbent core, a widely used and well-tolerated material in period care. The adhesive system (type unspecified by brand) bonds the layers; these are typically acrylate-based and remain on the pad surface rather than migrating into skin. No bleaching method is disclosed, so chlorine-based or oxygen-based processing is possible. Overall, this is a conventional formulation with no exotic additives that would trigger elevated concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Chlorine residues from bleaching

Brand does not disclose bleaching method for cellulose core. Chlorine-based bleaching is common in low-cost pads and can leave trace residues, though migration to skin is minimal. Oxygen bleaching is a gentler alternative but is not confirmed here.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination during storage or use

Any absorbent pad can harbor bacteria if stored in humid conditions or if worn for extended periods. This is a usage and hygiene issue, not a product formulation defect specific to Tranquility.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Adhesive residues and skin contact

Pad adhesives (typically acrylate-based) are designed to remain on the backing and not transfer to skin in normal use. No documented cases of dermatological reaction specific to Tranquility brand pads are on record.

95/ 100
✅

Fragrance and fragrance allergens

No fragrance or scent additives are listed for this product. Many period pads do contain fragrance; absence here reduces risk of allergic contact dermatitis in sensitive users.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modern adhesive systems in period pads do not typically rely on formaldehyde donors. No public disclosure or recall implicates this hazard class for Tranquility products.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Tranquility is a private-label or lesser-known brand with minimal public safety disclosures or third-party certifications on record. No major recalls, chemical controversies, or ingredient transparency initiatives are documented. The brand does not publicly claim GOTS, Cradle-to-Cradle, or similar ecolabels, suggesting either absence of certification or lack of marketing emphasis. This opacity is typical of budget-tier period products and does not itself indicate a safety failure.

How it compares in its category

Tranquility pads occupy the mainstream, no-frills segment alongside store brands and mid-market alternatives. They lack the premium positioning (and pricing) of brands claiming organic cotton, hypoallergenic formulae, or reduced-chemical processes. In terms of established hazard profiles, cellulose-core pads sit in a low-risk zone compared to all-synthetic or heavily fragranced variants. Most period pads sold at scale use similar core chemistry, making this a category-typical choice rather than a standout.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight to prevent adhesive degradation. Replace pads every 4 to 8 hours depending on flow; extended wear increases bacterial growth risk and is unrelated to pad chemistry. Discontinue use if rash, irritation, or allergic reaction occurs and switch brands to identify a trigger. No special handling or maintenance is required; discard after use per standard sanitation practices.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tranquility has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.