PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall16/ 100Bad
Arc'teryx Aerios 18 Backpack

Arc'teryx · Backpacks

Arc'teryx Aerios 18 Backpack

Bad

Arc'teryx provides no public PFAS transparency despite known water-repellent coating treatment.

Verdict: SkipSolid nylon/polyester backpack with water-repellent coating; PFAS concern unresolved by Arc'teryx; otherwise low-risk if maintained properly.

The Aerios 18 uses nylon and polyester with a water-repellent coating typical of outdoor packs. Arc'teryx does not publicly disclose whether PFAS is used or absent from their materials.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Arc'teryx does not disclose whether the Aerios 18 uses legacy fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating (which may contain PFAS) or fluorocarbon-free alternatives. Contact with skin or food is negligible during backpack use, but microfiber shedding during washing could theoretically release small amounts of coating residue into laundry water.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Nylon and polyester fiber shedding

The nylon/polyester blend is chemically stable under normal backpack conditions (no heat exposure, no food contact). Microfiber release during washing is a general concern for all synthetic textiles but carries no established toxicological risk from the fibers themselves.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public reports of formaldehyde issues in Arc'teryx packs. Nylon and polyester textiles may use formaldehyde-based resins in dye fixation, but Arc'teryx does not market this as a premium backpack vulnerable to formaldehyde off-gassing like some apparel does.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Metal hardware corrosion or leaching

The pack likely includes steel or aluminum buckles, zippers, and D-rings. No documented issues of heavy metal leaching from Arc'teryx hardware; outdoor gear hardware is typically sealed or anodized to resist corrosion.

95/ 100

VOC off-gassing from adhesives or coatings

New backpacks may have a chemical odor from manufacturing and water-repellent coating application, but this is temporary and resolves with airing out. Arc'teryx does not use foam padding or flame retardants typical of furniture, so long-term off-gassing risk is minimal.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Aerios 18 uses a nylon and polyester blend fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment applied to the exterior. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on legacy PFAS compounds (like PFOA) to repel water, though many brands have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives in recent years. Arc'teryx has not publicly disclosed whether this pack uses fluorocarbon-based or fluorocarbon-free water-repellent coating, leaving uncertainty about PFAS content. Nylon and polyester themselves are stable synthetics with low leaching risk during normal backpack use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Arc'teryx is a premium outdoor brand owned by Salomon/Amer Sports with a strong reputation for durability and performance but a limited public stance on chemical transparency. The company does not routinely disclose water-repellent coating treatment chemistry, PFAS test results, or supply-chain certifications for backpacks on product pages or marketing materials. No major recalls or contamination incidents are documented for this specific model. The silence on PFAS treatment, standard across many outdoor gear makers, reflects industry-wide opacity rather than a unique Arc'teryx failure.

How it compares in its category

Mid-range technical backpacks typically use nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating; Arc'teryx's version is well-engineered but not exceptional in material safety disclosure. Some competitors (e.g., Patagonia) have published PFAS reduction commitments and third-party certifications; others remain equally silent. Budget alternatives often use cheaper synthetics without advanced coatings, trading water resistance for clarity. Premium ultralight packs sometimes skip water-repellent coating entirely, avoiding the PFAS question altogether but sacrificing weather protection.

If you buy it

Wash the pack regularly with plain water or mild detergent to reduce any residual coating wear or dirt buildup; avoid dry-cleaning and high-heat drying, which can degrade nylon fibers. The water-repellent coating treatment will wear down over 2-5 years of heavy use; you can refresh it with commercially available water-repellent coating re-treatment sprays (check the product label for PFAS-free options if that concerns you). Inspect straps and seams annually for fraying or stress damage. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow UV degradation of the nylon.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Arc'teryx has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More backpacks grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.