PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall16/ 100Bad
ASICS Men's GEL-VENTURE 11 WATERPROOF

ASICS · Running & Athletic Shoes

ASICS Men's GEL-VENTURE 11 WATERPROOF

Bad

Waterproof hiking shoe; water-repellent coating likely contains PFAS, but unconfirmed.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof hiking shoe with likely PFAS-based water-repellent coating; no other textile hazards reported. Buy only if PFAS concern is acceptable; maintain carefully.

ASICS does not disclose PFAS use or restrictions in this waterproof shoe. The waterproofing treatment is typical of water-repellent coating-coated footwear, often PFAS-based, but no public lab testing or brand statement available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Textile upper with unspecified waterproof coating/water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100

Coating degradation and leachates from water-repellent coating

As the unspecified water-repellent coating degrades over 1-2 years of use, fragments or breakdown products may shed into soil or water. If the coating is fluorinated (likely), degradation products may persist in the environment; direct skin contact risk from shed particles is low but not zero.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

No recalls or warnings for azo dyes in ASICS footwear are established. Textile dyeing in athletic shoes is regulated in most markets, and no specific concern has been reported for this model.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Textile finishing processes may include formaldehyde-based resins to set shape and water-repellency; ASICS does not disclose whether this shoe uses such treatments. No specific formaldehyde concern has been reported for this product line.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

If the textile upper includes polyester, antimony may be present as a catalyst residue from polyester synthesis. ASICS does not disclose antimony levels; trace amounts in polyester are typically below concern thresholds but are not routinely tested or disclosed.

95/ 100

Adhesive and solvent residues

Athletic shoe assembly typically uses polyurethane or epoxy adhesives; volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from manufacturing solvents may off-gas briefly after purchase. No specific safety concern has been established for ASICS footwear in this regard.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The GEL-VENTURE 11 uses a textile upper with an unspecified waterproof or water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating. water-repellent coating treatments on outdoor footwear typically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to create water-shedding properties; ASICS has not publicly disclosed the specific chemistry of this shoe's coating. The textile substrate itself is not a known concern; the coating is the primary chemical consideration.

The brand's record and disclosure

ASICS has not published a clear PFAS policy or commitment to phasing out fluorinated water-repellent treatments in footwear. The company does not routinely disclose coating chemistry on product pages or marketing materials. No major recalls or regulatory actions specific to textile hazards in ASICS footwear are on record. This silence on chemical composition is typical for the athletic footwear industry but reflects limited transparency.

How it compares in its category

Most waterproof hiking and outdoor shoes in this price range use fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings; ASICS is not unique in this regard. Some competitors (e.g., certain Salomon or Merrell models) now offer PFAS-free wax or silicone-based water repellency, though availability and durability vary. The GEL-VENTURE 11's coating durability and water resistance are likely competitive, but the chemical trade-off is unspecified and unresolved.

If you buy it

Avoid washing in hot water or high-heat drying; air-dry after wet use to preserve the coating. Do not machine wash; hand-clean with cool water and mild soap only. Reapply water-repellent coating periodically if water no longer beads on the surface (typically after 1-2 seasons of heavy use). Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to slow coating breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
ASICS has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Running & Athletic Shoes

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and color-based toxins

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70

Standard athletic shoe with no known PFAS triggers, but no brand disclosure.

Risky category by default

Diadora Atomo V7000-2

Diadora

Atomo V7000-2

Textile fabric, likely polyester or nylon blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and rubber off-gassing

Limited concern

70

No public PFAS disclosure; lower concern but unverified.

Risky category by default

More running & athletic shoes grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.