PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
Dr. Scholl's Go Sockless! Cushioning Insoles

Dr. Scholl's · Synthetic Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

Dr. Scholl's Go Sockless! Cushioning Insoles

Good

Lower concern without known PFAS indicators, but no brand data.

Verdict · SkipFoam insoles pose minimal established hazards; no major recalls or safety warnings on record. PFAS disclosure gap is the only material concern.

Foam and gel cushioning without water-repellent or stain treatments visible in product info. No PFAS claims or test results available from the brand.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

foam cushioning, polyurethane gel, textile cover

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Dr. Scholl's Go Sockless! Insoles is made of, ingredients and materials

Dr. Scholl's Go Sockless insoles use polyurethane foam cushioning (likely polyol-based) with a polyurethane gel layer and a textile cover. Polyurethane foams are generally stable once cured and do not release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at room temperature the way fresh foam can. The textile cover is typically a synthetic blend; if it contains any flame retardant finish or azo dyes, those would be the primary chemical concern, though Dr. Scholl's does not publicly disclose the textile treatment.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Polyurethane foam degradation and particle shedding

Aged or heavily compressed polyurethane foam can break down into fine particles. While ingestion risk is minimal in insole use, inhalation of particles during replacement is theoretically possible but not documented as a safety issue for this product specifically.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Polyurethane gel formulations sometimes contain PFAS-based additives; textile covers may be treated with PFAS water repellents. Dr. Scholl's provides no disclosure on either. This is graded separately at 65/100 safety but remains a transparency gap.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Dr. Scholl's does not disclose whether the synthetic textile cover uses azo dyes or formaldehyde-based finishing resins. No recalls or complaints on record for this product; risk is low given that dyes are not typically released through foot contact alone.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Adhesive leachables from foam-to-textile bonding

Polyurethane adhesives used to bond foam to cover could potentially contain residual solvents or unreacted isocyanates. No public testing or complaints exist for Dr. Scholl's insoles; any residual adhesive would not migrate significantly at room temperature.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Dr. Scholl's (owned by Reckitt Benckiser) has no major safety recalls specific to their insole products in recent years. The brand does not publish detailed material transparency or chemical testing reports for insoles on their website. They remain silent on PFAS use, which is common for footwear accessories but notable given growing consumer awareness. No certifications such as OEKO-TEX or similar textile safety standards are advertised for this product line.

How it compares in its category

Cushioning insoles as a category carry minimal inherent hazard compared to, for example, flame-retardant textiles or cosmetics. Dr. Scholl's insoles are mid-market comfort products with no premium eco or safety positioning. Alternatives such as cork or natural latex insoles would avoid polyurethane entirely, though they cost more; gel insoles from competitors face the same PFAS and material disclosure gaps.

If you buy it

Store insoles in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight; polyurethane degrades faster in heat and UV. Replace every 6-12 months depending on wear, as compressed foam loses cushioning and may begin to break down. Hand wash the textile cover if soiled; avoid machine washing or high heat, which can degrade the adhesive bonding foam layers. No special precautions are needed for normal foot contact; insoles do not come into direct contact with skin long enough for significant dermal exposure to leachables.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dr. Scholl's has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.