PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Duluth Trading Company BBQ Grilling Apron

Duluth Trading · Work Aprons

Duluth Trading Company BBQ Grilling Apron

Bad

Avoid until Duluth discloses water-repellent coating ingredients; traditional finishes often use PFAS.

Verdict: SkipCotton-poly blend with undisclosed water-repellent coating finish; no known toxicity recalls, but PFAS chemistry unknown and brand lacks transparency on chemical inputs.

Duluth Trading's BBQ apron is cotton/polyester treated for stain and moisture resistance, typical water-repellent coating uses that historically rely on fluorochemicals. The brand will not disclose finish chemistry.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton/poly blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry

water-repellent coating finishes on cotton-poly blends historically use PFAS-based compounds; Duluth Trading has not disclosed their specific chemistry. Risk is contingent on whether they have adopted fluorine-free alternatives or retained traditional PFAS formulations.

70/ 100
⚠️

Residual reactive chemicals on untreated fabric

water-repellent coating-treated textiles may carry residual unreacted precursor chemicals or catalysts from the coating process. Washing before use reduces exposure, though complete removal is not guaranteed without full disclosure of treatment chemistry.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or test results on record for Duluth Trading aprons. Cotton-poly blends can contain formaldehyde resins from shrink-control treatments, but no specific hazard has been documented for this brand or product.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Color bleeding or transfer from direct skin contact

No specific incidents reported for this apron. Polyester-blend dyes occasionally transfer in humid conditions or on damp skin, but this is a cosmetic rather than toxicological concern and is not a known issue with Duluth's dye lots.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This apron is a cotton-polyester blend treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. The cotton provides breathability and comfort; the polyester adds durability and wrinkle resistance. The water-repellent coating is the critical unknown: traditional water-repellent coating finishes have historically relied on PFAS-based chemistry, though some modern alternatives use fluorine-free or silicone-based systems. Duluth Trading has not publicly disclosed which chemistry they use, leaving the actual chemical risk profile opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Duluth Trading Company is a private outdoor/workwear retailer without published chemical disclosure policies or third-party certifications (such as Oeko-Tex or GOTS) on their website for this product line. The company has not issued statements about PFAS avoidance or water-repellent coating chemistry transparency. No major recalls or toxicity incidents are publicly associated with Duluth Trading aprons. Their silence on material sourcing and chemical inputs is typical for mid-market workwear but represents a governance gap compared to competitors with formal chemical management programs.

How it compares in its category

BBQ aprons in this price-performance tier typically use cotton-poly blends with water-resistant treatments, and most brands similarly do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Higher-end alternatives from brands like Curt and Carhartt also remain vague on fluorine inputs; budget alternatives often omit water-repellent coating altogether. Duluth's apron sits in the middle: functional and durable, but not differentiated by chemical transparency. If PFAS avoidance is a priority, few mainstream workwear brands currently offer audited fluorine-free water-repellent coating options at this price point.

If you buy it

Wash the apron in cool water before first use to reduce residual finishes and dyes. Avoid high heat (no dryer; air dry to preserve the water-repellent coating). Do not bleach or use harsh chemicals, as these can degrade the water-repellent layer and potentially mobilize surface residues. Replace the apron if the water-repellent coating visibly breaks down (water no longer beads on fabric) or if staining becomes permanent, as this signals coating failure and loss of its functional barrier.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Duluth Trading has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Work Aprons

Dickies 2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078

Dickies

2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078

100% canvas cotton, uncoated

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower risk from plain canvas apron with no performance finishes.

Risky category by default

Dickies Toolmaker's Apron

Dickies

Toolmaker's Apron

Cotton duck fabric

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower risk from traditional cotton apron, though no lab confirmation exists.

Risky category by default

Duluth Trading Company Plus Heirloom Gardening Apron Smock

Duluth Trading

Company Plus Heirloom Gardening Apron Smock

Cotton canvas apron, no waterproof or stain-resistant coating disclosed

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower risk from plain canvas apron with no water or stain treatment.

Risky category by default

More work aprons grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.