PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Men Running shoes Mizuno Neo Lumina Gtx

Mizuno · Running & Athletic Shoes

Men Running shoes Mizuno Neo Lumina Gtx

Bad

Gore-Tex waterproofing likely contains PFAS. No brand disclosure available.

Verdict: SkipGore-Tex waterproofing likely contains PFAS; no other major hazards reported for Mizuno mesh uppers. Wearable if PFAS exposure acceptable to user.

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX uses Gore-Tex for waterproofing, which traditionally relies on PFAS chemistry. Mizuno provides no public PFAS transparency or alternative waterproof claims.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Mesh/synthetic upper with Gore-Tex waterproof membrane

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gore-Tex waterproofing relies on fluorinated polymers to function. No alternative waterproof technology is embedded in this shoe; PFAS exposure occurs during wear, washing, and eventual disposal. Mizuno has disclosed no remediation plan.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester mesh may contain antimony trioxide as a polymerization catalyst. Levels are typically trace and not a concern during normal wear, but prolonged skin contact in hot, humid conditions (sweating feet) could theoretically increase dermal migration. No Mizuno-specific data available.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic upper

Polyester/nylon mesh sheds microfibers during washing and wear. Gore-Tex membrane itself may fragment under UV and mechanical stress over the shoe's lifespan. This is a category-wide issue, not brand-specific, but accelerated if machine-washed frequently.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or reports of formaldehyde contamination specific to Mizuno mesh uppers. Standard synthetic footwear adhesives and dyes are regulated under REACH/Prop 65; no excess documented for this brand or product line.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes (colorfast/toxicity risk)

Mizuno uses standard industrial dyeing for polyester/nylon mesh. No specific batch recalls for prohibited azo dyes reported for Neo Lumina GTX. EU and Asian manufacturers typically comply with azo restrictions, though audit records are not public.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Neo Lumina GTX uses a mesh synthetic upper (typically polyester or nylon) bonded to Gore-Tex, a Teflon-family coating membrane that repels water while allowing breathability. Gore-Tex's waterproofing mechanism inherently relies on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) to achieve its hydrophobic barrier, a known limitation of this technology. The synthetic mesh itself poses minimal chemical risk during normal wear, but repeated washing and degradation of the Gore-Tex layer over time may mobilize PFAS particles, particularly if the shoe is machine-washed frequently.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mizuno has not published detailed disclosures regarding PFAS content or phase-out commitments for its waterproof product lines. The brand maintains no publicly announced PFAS elimination timeline comparable to competitors such as Salomon or Altra. Mizuno does comply with standard regulatory limits (REACH, Prop 65) but silence on Gore-Tex sourcing and PFAS intentionality means no transparency advantage relative to industry practice.

How it compares in its category

Running shoes with Gore-Tex waterproofing are standard across premium brands; Mizuno's approach is typical, not differentiated. Non-waterproofed mesh alternatives (Nike, ASICS, Brooks standard lines) entirely avoid the PFAS issue but sacrifice wet-weather performance. If waterproofing is necessary, this product sits in the mainstream middle; no brand in the category has solved Gore-Tex replacement with a proven PFAS-free waterproof yet widely adopted at scale.

If you buy it

Hand-wash in cool water with mild soap to extend Gore-Tex layer longevity and minimize PFAS particle shedding; avoid machine washing and high heat drying. Replace the shoe when tread wear or Gore-Tex degradation (visible water beading loss) occurs, typically 300-500 miles. Store dry in a cool place away from heat to slow membrane degradation. If PFAS minimization is a priority, consider non-waterproofed mesh alternatives for training and reserve Gore-Tex shoes for occasional wet-weather runs only.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mizuno has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Running & Athletic Shoes

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and color-based toxins

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70

Standard athletic shoe with no known PFAS triggers, but no brand disclosure.

Risky category by default

Diadora Atomo V7000-2

Diadora

Atomo V7000-2

Textile fabric, likely polyester or nylon blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and rubber off-gassing

Limited concern

70

No public PFAS disclosure; lower concern but unverified.

Risky category by default

More running & athletic shoes grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.