PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Wave Mujin TL GTX Sports Style Sneaker

Mizuno · Running & Athletic Shoes

Wave Mujin TL GTX Sports Style Sneaker

Bad

GTX membrane raises PFAS concern; Mizuno discloses nothing.

Verdict: SkipGore-Tex membrane carries established PFAS load; other textile hazards minimal if managed. Acceptable only with awareness and proper care.

Gore-Tex waterproof lining is conventionally treated with PFAS. Mizuno provides no PFAS disclosure or third-party verification for this model. Consider alternatives with verified PFAS-free waterproofing.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Textile upper with Gore-Tex GTX waterproof membrane

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

If the upper contains polyester (common in Mizuno athletic shoes), antimony trioxide may be present as a catalyst from polyester synthesis. Levels in finished apparel are generally low and skin contact exposure is minimal, but the chemical is classified as a possible human carcinogen by IARC.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from membrane degradation

Gore-Tex membranes are prone to physical delamination and microfiber release over time, particularly with repeated flexing at seams and creases. Washing synthetic waterproof shoes releases microplastics into water; this is documented for the product category, though not quantified for this specific model.

45/ 100
🍳

Chemical leaching from GTX adhesives and coatings

The bond between textile and Gore-Tex membrane uses polyurethane-based adhesives and often silicone or additional polymer layers. Heat, moisture (sweat), and wear can cause slow migration of unreacted monomers and plasticizers into foot contact areas, though levels in shoes are typically lower than in food-contact plastics.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recall or published testing confirms formaldehyde finishes on Mizuno GTX uppers. Standard polyester/nylon athletic textiles may carry trace formaldehyde from manufacturing, but at levels typically below regulatory thresholds for finished apparel.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes (synthetic colorants)

No specific azo dye safety alert exists for this model. Mizuno uses industrial dyeing typical of the industry; restricted azo compounds are regulated under REACH and similar standards, but full chemical dye formulations are not publicly disclosed.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This sneaker uses a textile upper paired with Gore-Tex GTX, a polyurethane-based waterproof membrane bonded to the fabric. Gore-Tex achieves water resistance through microscopic pore structure, but historically relied on PFOA/PFOS and related fluorochemicals to maintain durability and water repellency. The textile upper itself is likely polyester or nylon blend with cotton or other natural fibers. Mizuno does not disclose the specific fluorochemical formulation used in their GTX membrane sourcing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mizuno is a mid-tier sportswear manufacturer with no public commitment to PFAS phase-out or fluorochemical transparency. The company does not publish material sourcing documents, chemical inventories, or third-party testing results for individual shoe lines. Gore-Tex itself has made commitments to remove legacy PFOS/PFOA but continues using newer fluorinated compounds (GenX, ADONA, others) that remain largely unregulated and understudied. Mizuno's silence on which version of GTX they use leaves uncertainty about the actual fluorochemical burden in this shoe.

How it compares in its category

Most waterproof athletic sneakers at this price point use Gore-Tex or similar fluorinated membranes; PFAS presence is near-universal in the category. Non-fluorinated waterproof alternatives (wax-treated textiles, ceramic coatings, silicone polymers) exist but are less common in mass-market sports shoes and often sacrifice durability or breathability. Brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx offer PFAS-free waterproof options at higher cost but are rare in mainstream athletic footwear. This shoe is typical for its category but offers no competitive advantage in chemical safety.

If you buy it

Wear indoors or in dry conditions when possible to reduce contact with skin and limit fluorochemical leaching from the membrane. Clean with cool water and mild soap only; avoid hot water, bleach, or aggressive scrubbing, which can degrade the GTX layer and increase microfiber/chemical shedding. Replace after visible wear to the membrane (white delamination, loss of water beading) as degradation may increase leachate release. Store dry in a cool place; never heat-dry or expose to direct heat, which accelerates fluorochemical migration into sweat and foot moisture.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mizuno has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Running & Athletic Shoes

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and color-based toxins

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70

Standard athletic shoe with no known PFAS triggers, but no brand disclosure.

Risky category by default

Diadora Atomo V7000-2

Diadora

Atomo V7000-2

Textile fabric, likely polyester or nylon blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and rubber off-gassing

Limited concern

70

No public PFAS disclosure; lower concern but unverified.

Risky category by default

More running & athletic shoes grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.