Rip Curl Dawn Patrol Chest Zip Wetsuit
Skip until Rip Curl discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or commits to PFAS-free standards.
Rip Curl's Dawn Patrol wetsuit uses neoprene with a water-repellent coating typical of performance wetsuits, but the brand does not disclose whether PFAS compounds are in that finish.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Neoprene with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.
Category baseline
PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
PFAS
The water-repellent coating finish is the primary unknown hazard vector. Rip Curl does not disclose whether it uses legacy fluorinated compounds (likely PFAS) or newer alternatives. Rated 'possible' because water-repellent coating on wetsuits historically relied on PFAS, though some reformulation may have occurred.
Source: ATSDR ↗Microplastic shedding from coating or material
As water-repellent coating coatings age and neoprene flexes repeatedly, microscopic fragments may shed into seawater. This is an environmental concern rather than a direct wearer safety hazard, but links to the product's lifecycle impact.
What’s reassuring
Neoprene degradation and leaching
Neoprene itself is chemically stable under normal water exposure and skin contact. No documented leaching of harmful substances from neoprene into seawater or on-skin microabrasion has been established in public records for wetsuits.
Heavy metals
No recalls or test reports of heavy metal contamination (cadmium, lead, antimony) in neoprene wetsuits from Rip Curl or the category have been documented. Neoprene is typically black or dark-colored; azo dyes and pigment risks are lower than in textiles but not zero.
Source: FDA ↗Off-gassing or volatile organic compounds
Neoprene wetsuits do not release measurable VOCs or formaldehyde during normal use, wear, or storage. Off-gassing is not a recognized hazard in this product category.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Dawn Patrol uses neoprene (chloroprene rubber) as its core insulation material, which is inherently stable and does not leach known toxins into water or skin during normal use. The critical unknown is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer shell. water-repellent coating coatings are historically a major PFAS delivery system in textiles, though some brands have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives. Rip Curl has not publicly disclosed the chemistry of their water-repellent coating treatment on this model.
The brand's record and disclosure
Rip Curl has not issued a public commitment to eliminate PFAS from wetsuits or published test results for their water-repellent coating coatings as of available records. The brand remains silent on PFAS policy despite growing industry movement toward disclosure (e.g., by competitors like Patagonia and some smaller manufacturers). This silence makes it impossible to verify whether the Dawn Patrol's water repellency relies on legacy fluorinated compounds or newer alternatives. Without transparency, consumers cannot make an informed choice.
How it compares in its category
Most mainstream wetsuits (Rip Curl, O'Neill, Quiksilver, Xcel) apply water-repellent coating finishes without public PFAS disclosure, making the Dawn Patrol typical in its risk profile, not outlying. A smaller segment of brands (e.g., Fourth Element, some eco-focused makers) explicitly use PFAS-free water repellency or accept that water-repellent coating will wash out over time. Rip Curl's mid-market positioning means it is unlikely to have invested in costlier PFAS-free chemistry unless market pressure increases. The trade-off between durability and chemical risk is unresolved for this product.
If you buy it
Rinse the wetsuit in fresh water after every use and allow it to air-dry away from direct heat or sunlight to slow degradation of the water-repellent coating and any potential leaching. Do not machine wash or dry-clean; hand washing in cool water extends the life of both neoprene and the finish. Replace the suit if seams degrade, as water ingress accelerates heat loss and signals overall material breakdown. If brand PFAS policy changes or third-party testing becomes available, revisit your purchase decision.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Rip Curl has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Wetsuits
Patagonia
Men's Yulex Regulator Lite Front-Zip Full Wetsuit
Yulex (synthetic rubber, PTMEG-based), neoprene-free
Lower concern; Yulex rubber base avoids traditional neoprene, but water-repellent coating silence limits confidence.
⚠Risky category by default
Patagonia
Men's Yulex Regulator Lite Long John Wetsuit
Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative
Lower concern; Yulex is PFAS-free by design, but no explicit brand confirmation provided.
⚠Risky category by default
Patagonia
Men's R2 Yulex Regulator Front-Zip Full Wetsuit
Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free base
Lower concern; Yulex is a synthetic rubber alternative without known PFAS use, but water-repellent coating unverified.
⚠Risky category by default
More wetsuits grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.