PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Women's Saucony Ride TR2 GTX

Saucony · Running & Athletic Shoes

Women's Saucony Ride TR2 GTX

Bad

GTX waterproofing often uses PFAS; Saucony silent on this.

Verdict · SkipPFAS in GTX membrane is the primary concern; textile base carries standard apparel hazards. Saucony's silence on PFAS chemistry and lack of public commitment to alternatives limits confidence despite no major recalls on record.

Saucony Ride TR2 GTX uses Gore-Tex, a laminated membrane traditionally reliant on PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure or commitment regarding this footwear.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Textile with GTX waterproof membrane

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gore-Tex fabric is not confirmed PFAS-free by Saucony or Gore for this product. PFAS use in Teflon-type coating-based membranes is well-documented in footwear; the exact formulation and PFAS concentrations in this shoe are not publicly available.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in textile

Synthetic dyes used in polyester or nylon uppers may include azo compounds, some of which are restricted in the EU but not banned in the US. Saucony does not disclose dye chemistry for this model; testing would be required to confirm presence or absence.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic textile finishes (water resistance, wrinkle resistance, antimicrobial treatments) may contain or release formaldehyde. No formaldehyde content limits are stated in product documentation; off-gassing typically decreases after initial wear and ventilation.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🍂

Membrane delamination and microplastic shedding

As the GTX laminate ages and separates, microscopic synthetic particles may shed. This is a mechanical wear issue rather than a chemical hazard, but contributes to microplastic load if shoes are washed frequently in machines.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or public reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination in this shoe model. Adhesives and inks are not disclosed; standard industry compliance with apparel restrictions (lead content) applies.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Ride TR2 GTX combines a textile upper (likely polyester or nylon blend) with a Gore-Tex (GTX) waterproof membrane laminated to the interior. Gore-Tex's waterproofing historically relied on Teflon-type coating-based chemistry, which often includes fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water repellency and breathability. The textile itself may contain dyes, finishes, and coatings applied during manufacturing; exact formulations are not publicly disclosed by Saucony for this model.

The brand's record and disclosure

Saucony has not published a public statement, commitment, or timeline regarding PFAS phase-out or use in waterproof footwear. The company does not disclose waterproofing chemistry in product specifications or material safety documentation available to consumers. No major recalls or formal hazard warnings specific to this shoe model are on record, but the absence of disclosure reflects a broader industry pattern rather than confirmation of safety.

How it compares in its category

Most GTX-equipped athletic footwear carries the same PFAS exposure profile as this model, since GTX is a widely licensed material standard. Non-GTX waterproof alternatives (sealed seams with water-resistant coatings, or waxed textile layers) avoid PFAS-based membrane technology but may sacrifice breathability or durability. Saucony's lack of transparency on this issue is consistent with most mainstream athletic brands; few have committed publicly to PFAS-free waterproofing.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air dry; heat (machine dryer, direct sun) can degrade the GTX membrane and potentially accelerate any coating breakdown. Replace when waterproofing noticeably fails, seams separate, or tread wears significantly, typically 300-500 miles of use. Store in a dry place; mold or mildew growth under the membrane is possible if shoes are left damp for extended periods. If PFAS exposure is a priority concern, inquire directly with Saucony's customer service about alternative waterproof models or request more detailed material chemistry before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Saucony has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Running & Athletic Shoes

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and color-based toxins

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70

Standard athletic shoe with no known PFAS triggers, but no brand disclosure.

Starting grade for this product type

New Balance Men's Fresh Foam X Hierro v9

New Balance

Men's Fresh Foam X Hierro v9

Knit textile upper, foam midsole, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good
🎨

Azo dyes and textile colorants

Limited concern

70
💨

Foam off-gassing (midsole)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester components

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Starting grade for this product type

ASICS Men's Trail Scout 3

ASICS

Men's Trail Scout 3

Mesh textile upper with synthetic overlays, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade51Good
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation and leachables from adhesives

Moderate concern

45

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Starting grade for this product type

More running & athletic shoes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.