PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall38/ 100Poor
Spiderwire Stealth Translucent

Spiderwire · Fishing Line

Spiderwire Stealth Translucent

Good

Skip; fishing line coating unspecified, PFAS risk unclear without transparency.

Verdict: SkipBraided fishing line with undisclosed coating; no acute hazards established, but lack of transparency on coating chemistry and PFAS mitigation warrants cautious use and brand accountability pressure.

Braided fishing line with undisclosed coating formulation. Fishing lines often use Teflon-family coating or similar coatings for low visibility and durability, potentially containing PFAS.

The safe swap

PowerPro Power Pro Braided Line

Shimano

PowerPro Power Pro Braided Line

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Braided fishing line; coating composition undisclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

Has a special coating but the exact formula is secret.

75/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed coating leachables (potential organics)

The proprietary topcoat composition is unknown; braided fishing line coatings may contain synthetic resins, silicones, or UV stabilizers that could leach into water or onto skin under mechanical stress. No testing or leaching data for this specific product is publicly available.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Over time and with UV exposure, the coating may flake or degrade, releasing microparticles into water or onto equipment. The durability and degradation profile of Spiderwire's coating is not independently verified in public literature.

70/ 100
⚠️

Environmental persistence in aquatic systems

Fishing line is frequently lost in waterways; if the coating contains persistent compounds (such as PFAS), environmental accumulation is a concern. The actual environmental fate of Spiderwire Stealth's coating is unknown without disclosure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Acute toxicity from coating compounds

No acute poisoning or significant adverse health events have been reported for this product. The coating is not ingested intentionally, and incidental dermal contact is low-risk if handled normally.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Translucent fishing line dyes are typically azo-based or synthetic organic colorants. No specific concerns for heavy metal contamination in Spiderwire's formulation have been documented; this is a low-risk category for fishing line compared to cosmetics or ceramics.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spiderwire Stealth Translucent is a braided polyethylene core with a proprietary coating designed to reduce visibility in water. The coating composition is not publicly disclosed by the manufacturer, which is standard practice in the fishing line industry but limits independent safety assessment. Braided polyethylene itself is inert, but the undisclosed topcoat is the variable: it may contain PFAS compounds for water-repellency and durability, silicones, resins, or other binding agents that could leach under stress or UV exposure.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spiderwire (owned by Pure Fishing) does not publicly disclose coating chemistry or make PFAS-free claims for this product line. The brand has maintained silence on PFAS in fishing lines despite industry awareness of the issue. No recalls or formal safety complaints specific to Stealth Translucent have been documented in public records. This lack of transparency is a significant disclosure gap for a product that may be in contact with food sources and aquatic environments.

How it compares in its category

Most braided fishing lines, including competitors like Berkley Fireline and Suffix, similarly do not disclose coating materials. Some brands (notably Cortland and certain eco-focused manufacturers) have begun offering PFAS-conscious alternatives, though they remain niche. Spiderwire Stealth Translucent is competitively mid-range on transparency; it is neither a leader in disclosure nor a clear outlier. The fishing line category as a whole lacks regulatory pressure to disclose or phase out PFAS in coatings.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to minimize degradation and potential leaching from the coating. Replace the line annually or when visible abrasion, clouding, or brittleness appears, as coating breakdown accelerates chemical release. Avoid prolonged contact with saltwater storage or extreme heat (e.g., sun-baked reels), which can compromise the coating. Wash hands after handling if you will be preparing food, as a precaution against any coating particles or residues.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spiderwire has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Fishing Line

BERKLEY TRILENE BIG GAME

Berkley

TRILENE BIG GAME

monofilament nylon fishing line

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade63Good

UV degradation and embrittlement

High concern

20
🫧

Microplastic release during use

Limited concern

70

Low concern for standard monofilament with no coating triggers.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Berkley Trilene Big Game Braid

Berkley

Trilene Big Game Braid

Braided polyethylene fishing line

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Polyethylene microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Low concern; braided polyethylene is not a typical PFAS application.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Berkley Trilene XT Monofilament Fishing Line

Berkley

Trilene XT Monofilament Fishing Line

Nylon monofilament (extruded polymer)

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🫧

Nylon polymer degradation and microplastic release

Limited concern

70
⚠️

UV stabilizer additives in polymer matrix

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or eye contact from monofilament filament

Moderate concern

45

Low concern for basic nylon line without water-repellent coating or special coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fishing line grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.