PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall53/ 100Good
Tommy Hilfiger Women's Hilfiger Logo Halter One-Piece Swimsuit

Tommy Hilfiger · Swimwear

Tommy Hilfiger Women's Hilfiger Logo Halter One-Piece Swimsuit

Good

Lower PFAS concern; standard nylon swimsuit with no disclosed treatments.

Verdict · SkipStandard nylon swimsuit with no known chemical hazards; lower PFAS risk; Tommy Hilfiger has no major swimwear safety recalls on record.

Basic nylon halter one-piece lacks documented water-repellent or stain-resistant coating. Tommy Hilfiger makes no PFAS claims; confidence is moderate.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon blend swimsuit fabric, no documented water-repellent coating specified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Tommy Hilfiger Women's Hilfiger Logo is made of, ingredients and materials

This swimsuit is a nylon blend, a synthetic polymer widely used in swimwear because it is water-resistant, durable, and quick-drying by design. Nylon itself does not leach harmful chemicals into water or skin under normal use. The halter one-piece construction means no elastic or metal hardware in sensitive areas; the main concern would be dyes used in the fabric and any finishes applied during manufacturing, but no water-repellent coating is documented, which removes the primary source of PFAS in modern swimwear.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and colorant migration

Nylon swimsuits are typically dyed with acid or reactive dyes. Low-quality batches may use azo dyes that can release aromatic amines if fabric is exposed to prolonged sweat, chlorine, or heat; Tommy Hilfiger does not publish dye standards for this line. Risk is minimized by rinsing and cool-water washing.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Nylon sheds microfibers when washed, especially in the first few wears. Wearing and washing a nylon swimsuit contributes to microplastic pollution; this is not unique to Tommy Hilfiger but is inherent to the material category. Using a wash bag can reduce fiber release.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Skin sensitization from residual processing chemicals

Swimsuits may retain small amounts of residual dyes, sizing agents, or anti-static compounds from manufacturing. Rinsing thoroughly before first wear and in cool water reduces the likelihood of contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-containing wrinkle-resist or antimicrobial finishes are documented on standard nylon swimwear. This product is not stated to have such treatments, so formaldehyde risk is not elevated.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

The halter design with simple metal hardware (likely nickel-plated steel or aluminum) poses low heavy-metal leaching risk in a swimsuit context. No lead or cadmium contamination has been reported in Tommy Hilfiger swimwear.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Tommy Hilfiger is a mainstream fashion brand owned by PVH Corp. The company has not published detailed chemical restriction policies specific to swimwear and does not disclose whether fabric dyes meet GOTS or OEKO-TEX standards for this product line. No major recalls for chemical contamination in Tommy Hilfiger swimwear have been documented in public records. The brand's silence on material certifications is typical for mass-market swimwear but does not indicate a known problem.

How it compares in its category

Standard nylon swimsuits from major brands (Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren) occupy the middle tier of the swimwear market. They lack the transparency and third-party chemical certifications of premium eco-brands like Patagonia or Summersalt, but also typically avoid performance coatings (silver-ion antimicrobials, water-repellent coating finishes) that introduce additional chemical exposure. This product is comparable to mass-market alternatives in chemical risk profile and slightly above budget brands in manufacturing consistency.

If you buy it

Rinse the swimsuit in fresh water after each use to remove chlorine, salt, and any loose dyes; this is standard care and reduces skin irritation. Wash in cool water with mild detergent and air-dry; do not use bleach or hot water, which can degrade the nylon and potentially release residual dyes. Replace the suit after 2-3 seasons of regular use (roughly 50-75 wears), as UV exposure and chlorine cause nylon to become brittle and lose elasticity. Store in a dry place away from direct sunlight to slow degradation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tommy Hilfiger has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.