Do Jack Wolfskin waterproof winter gloves have PFAS?
Jack Wolfskin waterproof winter gloves average 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 8 Jack Wolfskin waterproof winter gloves graded as of October 2026, level with the 20 out of 100 median for the 21 other waterproof winter gloves brands graded alongside it.
Jack Wolfskin waterproof winter gloves average Bad on our four-band scale. None of them clear our buy threshold. That is above 40% of the waterproof winter gloves brands we grade.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Jack Wolfskin
Men's Refl Winter Gloves
- Synthetic textile with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS, Winter glove water-repellent coating treatments are typically Teflon-family coating-based…
5 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Jack Wolfskin
Men's Winter Basic Gloves
- Synthetic insulation (likely polyester), nylon shell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS, Winter gloves require durable water repellency, nearly always achieved with fluorinated compounds on…
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Jack Wolfskin
Morobbia Lobster Gloves
- Synthetic insulation + textile shell with water-repellent coating treatment (unspecified)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating degradation and skin contact, As the fluorinated (or non-fluorinated) water-repellent…
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Jack Wolfskin
Stormlock Handschuhe Herren Glove Jack Wolfskin Winter Herren Fleece Gloves Jack Wolfskin
- Fleece/synthetic fiber with water-repellent treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS, Jack Wolfskin has not disclosed water-repellent coating chemistry. Industry standard for this product…
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Jack Wolfskin
Texapore Waterproof Gloves
- Texapore membrane (polyurethane-based waterproof coating)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS, Polyurethane membranes commonly contain fluorinated compounds for water repellency and durability; Jack…
5 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Jack Wolfskin
men Jack Wolfskin Supersonic Xt Glove
- Synthetic blend (polyester/nylon) with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Antimony in polyester fibers, Polyester often uses antimony trioxide as a catalyst during production. Levels…
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Jack Wolfskin
Women's Highloft Gloves
- Synthetic outer shell with water-repellent coating (unspecified type)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating degradation and leaching, Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry means the…
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Jack Wolfskin
Highloft Glove
- Synthetic insulation with water-repellent coating-treated outer shell
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry, Jack Wolfskin does not disclose whether…
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Better waterproof winter gloves from other brands
Graded higher than the Jack Wolfskin average of 20.
Patagonia
Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's
- Polyester fleece (recycled)
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Patagonia
R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts
- Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Allergic contact dermatitis (rubber/guayule sensitivity)
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Patagonia
Synchilla Gloves
- Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microplastics
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
The same question, asked of the other waterproof winter gloves brands
Best average grade first. Jack Wolfskin averages 20.
See every Jack Wolfskin product we grade on the Jack Wolfskin brand page, or the full waterproof winter gloves ranking.