The Best Non-Toxic Waterproof Winter Gloves of 2026

We scored 15 waterproof winter gloves for PFAS forever chemicals and other hazards, then ranked them safest first. The top pick is Patagonia Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts at 90/100. Every score below links to the full breakdown of what earned it.

How to read these scores. PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Each grade is a model-based assessment built from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, brand disclosures, recalls and third-party lab results where they exist. Read the full rubric to see exactly what adds and removes points.
93% of the 15 waterproof winter gloves we scored fail our PFAS and toxin screen.
PFAS Authority, September 2026. Free to cite with a link. See the full dataset.

The safest PFAS-free waterproof winter gloves we have scored

  1. 1
    Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

    Patagonia

    R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

    Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative

    PFAS Grade90Excellent
    Overall Grade82Excellent

    Coating degradation and water-repellency loss

    Limited concern

    70
    ⚠️

    Allergen potential from Yulex itself

    Limited concern

    70

    Lower PFAS concern; Yulex is a known PFAS-reduction choice, independent verification absent.

    Risky category by default

The waterproof winter gloves we would skip

Lowest scoring in this category, worst first.

The North Face Women's Montana Ski Glove

The North Face

Women's Montana Ski Glove

Nylon/polyester shell with waterproofing treatment

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

PFAS

High concern

20
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70

Wait for North Face to disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; ski gloves typically use PFAS-based waterproofing.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

The North Face Women's Etip Indi Gloves

The North Face

Women's Etip Indi Gloves

Nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade12Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70

Moderate PFAS risk from waterproofing; The North Face has not disclosed coating chemistry.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

The North Face Women's Osito Etip Glove

The North Face

Women's Osito Etip Glove

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish; fleece lining

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

PFAS

High concern

20
🫧

Polyester microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation and leaching from heat exposure

Limited concern

70

Moderate caution; typical fleece glove with likely water-repellent coating but no brand PFAS transparency.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

What we check on waterproof winter gloves

  • Confirmed PFAS, PTFE or fluoropolymer content, which is the heaviest penalty we apply.
  • Stain, water or grease resistant treatments, which usually mean fluorinated chemistry.
  • Whether the brand discloses what is in the product, or stays silent behind a “clean” claim.
  • Independent lab results and certifications where they exist.

Full point-by-point rubric on the methodology page.

The waterproof winter gloves brands that will not say

4 of the brands here publish nothing about PFAS at all. Silence is not evidence of harm, but it is why none of them score well on disclosure.

Columbia, Hestra, Patagonia, The North Face.

Common questions about PFAS-free waterproof winter gloves

Is waterproof winter gloves PFAS free?

Mostly not. Of the 15 waterproof winter gloves we have scored, 93% fail our PFAS and toxin screen, which leaves 1 that pass. The highest scoring is Patagonia Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts at 90 out of 100. The lowest is The North Face The North Face Women's Montana Ski Glove at 20.

What is the safest waterproof winter gloves you have scored?

Patagonia Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts, at 90 out of 100, which we band as Excellent. It is yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative.

Which waterproof winter gloves should I avoid?

The three lowest scoring we hold are The North Face The North Face Women's Montana Ski Glove at 20, The North Face The North Face Women's Etip Indi Gloves at 20, The North Face The North Face Women's Osito Etip Glove at 20. The problem with the first is that wait for North Face to disclose DWR chemistry; ski gloves typically use PFAS-based waterproofing.

Which waterproof winter gloves brands will not say whether they use PFAS?

4 of the brands we scored in this category publish nothing about PFAS at all, including Columbia, Hestra, Patagonia, The North Face. Silence is not evidence of harm, but it is the reason those brands cannot score well on disclosure.

Do you lab test waterproof winter gloves?

No. We score from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, disclosures and third party lab results where they exist. Where a product has been independently tested we use that result and say so.

Get the safe list, free

The products we score each week, and the safest alternative in every category.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Want to filter the whole category yourself? Browse all 15 waterproof winter gloves.