PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad
Bio Pack To-Go Containers - 6 pack Small

· Food Packaging

Bio Pack To-Go Containers - 6 pack Small

Poor

Lower concern but verify waterproof coating composition directly with the brand.

Verdict · SkipCompostable fiber containers with unspecified water-resistant coating pose moderate concern; verify coating composition with manufacturer before regular hot-food use.

Bio-based fiber containers typically avoid Teflon-type coating and Teflon-family coating. Hasn't published PFAS claims or disclosed the waterproof coating formula.

The better-graded swap

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

compostable pulp/fiber with water-resistant coating (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Bio Pack To-Go Containers - 6 pack Small is made of, ingredients and materials

Bio Pack To-Go containers are molded from compostable pulp or fiber (likely sugarcane bagasse or similar plant waste), which is food-safe when uncoated. The critical unknown is the water-resistant coating applied to the interior and exterior. The brand does not publicly specify whether this coating uses PFAS-based fluorochemicals, wax, or other sealants. The coating's chemical identity directly determines leaching risk into food, especially hot or fatty items.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

Water-resistant coating leachables (unspecified chemistry)

The interior coating formulation is not disclosed by the brand. Leaching into food is possible with heat, fat, or acidic contents, but cannot be assessed without knowing whether the coating is PFAS-free, wax-based, or synthetic polymer.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic release during heating or degradation

If the water-resistant coating is a synthetic polymer (rather than natural wax or bioplastic), heating or physical stress may cause microplastics to shed into food. The pulp substrate itself does not shed microplastics.

70/ 100
⚠️

Contamination from mold or bacterial biofilm if pre-wetted or stored damp

Porous fiber containers retain moisture more readily than plastic. If stored in humid conditions or wet before use, fungal or bacterial growth is possible. This is a use and storage issue rather than a formulation hazard.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Compostable pulp containers do not inherently contain BPA or phthalates. However, if adhesives or processing aids were used in molding, trace contamination is theoretically possible. No testing or complaints are on record for Bio Pack products.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are used in some paper and pulp products for strength and water resistance. The brand does not disclose use of such resins. No independent testing or recalls confirm their presence, but absence of disclosure is a gap.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The brand maintains a public commitment to compostable and sustainable packaging but does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or coating composition on their website or product labeling. No independent recalls, safety complaints, or certifications (such as OK compost or FDA approval statements) are on record for this specific product line. The brand's silence on PFAS and coating chemistry represents a disclosure gap rather than confirmed absence of concern.

How it compares in its category

Compostable fiber containers are marketed as alternatives to plastic-lined paper and expanded polystyrene with lower concern regarding certain chemical classes. However, they typically underperform plastic in barrier properties, necessitating a water-resistant coating whose safety depends entirely on formulation. Most established compostable container brands (such as World Centric or Footprint) disclose coating type (e.g., plant-based PHA or food-grade wax). Biopac's lack of transparency places it below peer standards for consumer trust.

If you buy it

Contact directly and request written confirmation that the water-resistant coating does not contain PFAS or other fluorochemicals. Avoid prolonged contact with hot (above 60 degrees Celsius) or fatty foods (oils, sauces, dressings) until coating safety is verified. Use for ambient or cool foods when possible. Check that containers are fully composted after use; if local composting is unavailable, disposal as waste may leave residual coating in landfill.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Bio Pack To-Go Containers - 6 pack Small?

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

Matter

Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ BPI Certified Compostable
  • Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Microbe/mold growth if stored damp

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Eco Products WorldView Compostable Take-Out Containers EP-SCRC32

Eco-Products

Eco Products WorldView Compostable Take-Out Containers EP-SCRC32

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ BPI Certified Compostable
  • Plant-based fiber (compostable sugarcane bagasse)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Bleaching agents and processing residues

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Eco-Products WorldView Sugarcane Take-Out Containers

Eco-Products

WorldView Sugarcane Take-Out Containers

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ BPI Certified Compostable
  • Sugarcane bagasse (post-consumer fiber)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Cellulose fiber degradation and food contact

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More food packaging grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.