Maxi Pads 12CT Regular W/Wings Bodyform Super Comfortable & Leak-Proof Protection Cushion Soft
Skip until Bodyform discloses waterproof coating composition.
Bodyform makes no PFAS claims or material disclosures. Period pads typically use water-repellent backings that may contain PFAS; no testing data available for this product.
The better-graded swap
Seventh Generation
Seventh Generation Chlorine Free Maxi Pads
100/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Cellulose-based absorbent core, polyethylene backing, waterproof barrier coating unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What Maxi Pads 12CT Regular W/Wings Bodyform is made of, ingredients and materials
Bodyform Regular pads use a cellulose-based absorbent core, which is a wood-pulp derivative with no inherent heavy metal or synthetic contaminant risk at the material level. The polyethylene (PE) backing is a common thermoplastic polymer that does not leach BPA or phthalates under normal use conditions. The critical unknown is the waterproof barrier coating, the product name claims leak-proof protection, but Bodyform has not publicly disclosed whether this coating contains PFAS (fluorochemicals), silicones, or other synthetic water-repellent agents. This opacity is the main safety limitation.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Vague safety claims only
Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.
PFAS
Waterproof barrier coating composition is undisclosed; PFAS is standard in period-product leak-proof layers across the industry. Bodyform has not committed to PFAS-free manufacturing, and no test data is publicly available for this product line.
Source, ATSDR ↗Polyethylene backing degradation
PE is stable under normal body-temperature and moisture exposure. Risk of microplastic shedding or plasticizer leaching is low, but backing integrity may degrade if stored at high heat or in very humid conditions, potentially compromising barrier function.
Adhesive or fragrance irritation
Product name includes 'Soft Cushion' marketing, suggesting potential fragrance or softening agent addition; Bodyform does not itemize adhesive or fragrance composition. Individual contact dermatitis is rare but possible, particularly for sensitive or compromised skin.
What’s reassuring
Skin contact allergens or sensitizers
No formaldehyde, azo dyes, or other common dermatological irritants are established in cellulose pulp or polyethylene backings. Fragrance or adhesive components are not itemized on packaging; individual sensitivity is possible but not linked to this brand in published reports.
Chlorine residues from bleaching
Cellulose cores in commercial pads are typically bleached; no dioxin or chlorine-related contamination is on record for Bodyform or mainstream competitors in this category. Industry-standard processing does not pose documented risk.
The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Bodyform, owned by Edgewell Personal Care (U.S. subsidiary of Essity), has not published ingredient transparency reports, PFAS testing data, or certifications such as OEKO-TEX or Cradle to Cradle for its menstrual products as of public record. The brand does not appear on lists of period-care manufacturers that have committed to phasing out PFAS-based water repellents. Absence of public disclosure on coating chemistry is a notable gap in category where some competitors (e.g., Seventh Generation, Cora) have made explicit non-PFAS commitments.
How it compares in its category
Bodyform Regular sits in the mainstream commercial segment; peers range from budget brands (Always, Kotex) with similarly opaque coating disclosures to premium or eco-focused alternatives (Cora, Rael, Natracare) that explicitly state PFAS-free or PFAS-tested status. Cellulose + polyethylene construction is standard across the category and carries comparable baseline material risk. The differentiator is waterproof coating transparency, where Bodyform lags disclosed competitors. Leak-proof performance claims do not imply safety; they only indicate a barrier function that could derive from problematic chemistry.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat and sunlight to prevent any polyethylene backing degradation or adhesive breakdown over time. Pads should be changed every 4-6 hours or sooner if saturated, as retention of menstrual fluid creates bacterial growth risk unrelated to the product chemistry. Do not flush; dispose in household waste. If you experience any localized skin irritation or contact sensitization, discontinue and consider a brand with published ingredient transparency or third-party testing to isolate the cause.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Bodyform has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Period Pads
Seventh Generation
Chlorine Free Maxi Pads
- organic cotton, wood pulp
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Fragrance allergen content
Nana
Maxi Thick
- cellulose, cotton blend, absorbent core
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bleach residues and processing chemicals in cellulose
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Kotex Natural
10pack Kotex Natural Normal Sanitary Pads
- Cotton, wood pulp absorbent core, plastic backing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Pesticide residue
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
More period pads grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.