PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
Always Infinity FlexFoam Pads

Always · Period Pads

Always Infinity FlexFoam Pads

Poor

Skip until Always discloses waterproof layer composition; period products warrant PFAS transparency.

Verdict: SkipAlways Infinity FlexFoam is safe for typical use, but PFAS in waterproof backing is undisclosed; use with awareness pending transparency.

Waterproof backing for leakproof function often uses fluorinated chemistry. Always doesn't disclose specific coating materials or PFAS status.

The safe swap

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Absorbent core with unspecified waterproof backing layer

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof backing composition is undisclosed; fluorochemical water repellents are common in period-pad backings and known to contain PFAS. No specific test results for Always Infinity FlexFoam are publicly available.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100
⚠️

Absorbent-core additives (dioxins, dyes, residual bleach)

Cellulose cores are typically bleached and may contain trace dioxins or dyes; Always does not disclose whether FlexFoam uses chlorine bleaching. Industry standard is low enough that regulatory concern is minimal, but transparency is absent.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (if fragmented version used)

Always Infinity products include fragrance and alcohol additives; contact dermatitis and irritation are reported by users sensitive to synthetic fragrances. FlexFoam variants without fragrance are available and reduce this risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from backing material or adhesive

No widespread reports specific to FlexFoam, but synthetic polymer backings and adhesives can cause contact dermatitis or rash in sensitive individuals. Reaction risk is lower than with highly fragranced or dyed products.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Microfiber shedding or material degradation

No documented cases of FlexFoam backing shedding microplastics during use. Pads are discarded intact under normal use, so exposure to degradation products is unlikely.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Always Infinity FlexFoam pads use a cellulose-based absorbent core (standard for period products) paired with an unnamed waterproof backing layer, likely a thermoplastic polymer or polyethylene film. The specific composition of that backing is not publicly disclosed by the brand, which is the core issue for PFAS risk assessment. Period pads require waterproof layers to prevent leakage, but manufacturers rarely specify whether these contain PFAS or fluorochemical water repellents, making informed choice difficult.

The brand's record and disclosure

Always (Procter & Gamble) has not published ingredient lists or material transparency statements specific to FlexFoam's backing layer composition. The brand has faced criticism from period-product safety advocates for declining to disclose PFAS use in menstrual products, despite disclosing fragrance and other additives. No recalls or major safety incidents have been reported for Always Infinity pads, and the brand holds no third-party certifications (such as FDA approval) that would independently verify material safety.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream period pads (Kotex, Tampax, Playtex) share the same waterproof-backing transparency gap; few brands fully disclose whether their backings contain PFAS. Some smaller brands (Cora, Rael) market themselves with PFAS-free or plastic-reduced positioning, though independent verification is limited. Organic cotton pads (Seventh Generation, Aunt Flow) typically avoid synthetic backings or specify their materials, offering a clearer alternative if PFAS avoidance is a priority.

If you buy it

Always Infinity pads are designed for single use and disposal; no maintenance or reuse is involved, reducing long-term exposure risk compared to reusable alternatives. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat to avoid any potential material breakdown. If concerned about PFAS, contact Always/P&G directly requesting waterproof-layer composition before committing to regular use. Consider rotating with PFAS-transparent brands or switching to certified organic options if this is a priority for your health profile.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Always has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Pads

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade52Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding or degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade44Poor
⚠️

Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyethylene microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear

High concern

20

Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive contact sensitivity

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bleaching residues in cellulose

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.

Risky category by default

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.