Always Radiant Regular Pads With Wings
Lower concern but opaque; waterproof backing likely uses water-repellent coating, brand silent.
Waterproof plastic backing may contain PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings, but Procter & Gamble provides no public disclosure. No third-party verification exists.
The safe swap
Tampax
TAMPAX PEARL ULTRA ABSORBENCY*18 COUNT
70/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
cellulose/SAP absorbent core with waterproof plastic backing
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.
Category baseline
PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Plastic backing composition and leaching
The waterproof plastic layer's full chemical identity is not disclosed by Always or P&G. While modern pads are designed to minimize leaching, trace compounds from plasticizers or water-repellent coating coatings could theoretically migrate into menstrual fluid under warm, humid conditions; no published safety data from the brand is available to rule this out.
Synthetic dyes and fragrance in top sheet
Always Radiant pads may contain synthetic dyes for visual branding and undisclosed fragrance compounds (often labeled as 'perfume' without ingredient breakdown). Fragrance allergens and dyes can trigger contact dermatitis or irritation in sensitive individuals; no hypoallergenic or fragrance-free certification is provided.
What’s reassuring
Superabsorbent polymer (SAP) purity and residues
Sodium polyacrylate in menstrual pads is widely used and generally recognized as safe by regulatory bodies when used in this application. No recalls or adverse event reports specifically linking Always Radiant SAP to systemic toxicity are on record; however, manufacturing residues or unreacted monomer are not routinely disclosed.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Cellulose-based absorbent cores do not inherently contain formaldehyde releasers, but adhesives or finishing agents used to bond layers could theoretically introduce them. No published testing or disclosure from Always clarifies whether formaldehyde-releasing compounds are used in the manufacturing process.
Source: ATSDR ↗Dioxin contamination from bleaching
Cellulose in modern pads is typically bleached with elemental chlorine or chlorine dioxide; modern mills are regulated to minimize dioxin formation. Always does not specify bleaching method, but dioxin residues in contemporary menstrual pads are considered negligible by regulatory standards if conventional bleaching is used.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Always Radiant Regular pads use a cellulose and superabsorbent polymer (SAP, likely sodium polyacrylate) core for fluid absorption, layered with a plastic film backing to prevent leakage. The waterproof backing's formulation is not publicly disclosed by Procter & Gamble; such backings commonly rely on water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings, which may contain PFAS or fluorine-free alternatives, but Always has not clarified their choice. Cellulose is relatively inert; the main chemical concern centers on what residues or additives remain in the SAP and whether the plastic backing leaches into the menstrual fluid over hours of wear.
The brand's record and disclosure
Procter & Gamble (Always owner) has not published ingredient lists for menstrual pads or publicly committed to PFAS elimination in this category, despite growing pressure from health advocates. The brand holds no independent safety certifications (e.g., Cradle to Cradle, Oeko-Tex) for these products, which limits third-party verification of chemical content. P&G's general sustainability reports focus on packaging and waste, not pad chemistry, leaving questions about formulation transparency unanswered.
How it compares in its category
Always Radiant is a mainstream, single-use disposable pad; it occupies the middle market between budget brands (often less regulated) and premium or organic alternatives (e.g., Seventh Generation, Rael, Veeda) that pursue explicit chemical certifications or disclose ingredient sourcing. Conventional pads dominate sales but typically do not publish full chemical data, making direct safety comparison difficult. Organic or plant-based pad brands tend to advertise fewer synthetic polymers and dyes, though cost and availability are trade-offs.
If you buy it
Use pads as directed on the package; change every 4-8 hours to minimize prolonged contact with the plastic backing and any potential leachables. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat or direct sunlight to avoid accelerating any degradation of the polymer core or plastic film. If you experience irritation, redness, or unusual odor, consider switching brands or consulting a healthcare provider, as sensitivity can vary individually. Do not rinse and reuse; these are single-use products designed for disposal.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Always has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Period Pads
OB
O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad
rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers
Microplastic shedding or degradation
Limited concern
Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers
Moderate concern
Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture
Limited concern
Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.
⚠Risky category by default
OB
/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279
cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)
Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization
Limited concern
Polyethylene microplastic shedding
Limited concern
Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear
High concern
Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.
⚠Risky category by default
OB
OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P
Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives
Adhesive contact sensitivity
Limited concern
Bleaching residues in cellulose
Limited concern
Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.
⚠Risky category by default
More period pads grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.