PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Columbia Men's Silver Ridge Utility Pants

Columbia · Hiking Pants

Columbia Men's Silver Ridge Utility Pants

Bad

High risk; skip until Columbia discloses water-repellent coating chemistry.

Verdict: SkipNylon blend with undisclosed water-repellent coating finish poses PFAS uncertainty; no other significant hazards reported. Buy only if Columbia confirms non-PFAS water treatment.

These nylon pants with water-repellent coating finish are commonly treated with PFAS or PFAS alternatives. Columbia makes no public disclosure of which water-repellent coating chemistry is used.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon blend with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Columbia has not disclosed whether Silver Ridge water-repellent coating uses PFAS or fluorine-free alternatives. Standard industry practice still favors PFAS-based formulations in mid-market brands. Skin contact during wear is low-risk; concern is primarily manufacturing and disposal exposure.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

Coating degradation over time

water-repellent coating finishes naturally degrade after 50-100 washes. As the coating breaks down, microscopic particles may shed into wash water. Degree of concern depends on whether particles contain PFAS; unknown for this product without chemistry disclosure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Synthetic dye residues and azo dyes

No recalls or safety alerts for Silver Ridge colorway dyes. Nylon textiles can retain trace dye chemicals, but Columbia operates under standard apparel manufacturing oversight. Prewash reduces any residual transfer.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon does not typically require formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist treatments. No evidence Columbia uses formaldehyde finishes on Silver Ridge line. Standard concern for cellulose blends, not nylon.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester additives

Silver Ridge is nylon-based, not polyester, so antimony catalyst residues are not a concern. Relevant only if product contained significant polyester component.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Columbia Silver Ridge Utility Pants are constructed from nylon blended fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer surface. water-repellent coating coatings are the primary point of chemical concern in this product. The nylon base itself is stable and non-leaching under normal wearing conditions, but the finish chemistry is what determines long-term safety. Columbia has not publicly disclosed whether their water-repellent coating uses PFAS compounds (legacy C8, C6, or newer alternatives) or fluorine-free chemistries.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not issued public statements about PFAS phase-out timelines or commitments to fluorine-free water-repellent coating adoption across their apparel lines, unlike outdoor brands such as Patagonia or The North Face. The company does not list water-repellent coating chemistry on product tags or websites. No major recalls or safety violations specific to Silver Ridge pants have been documented. This silence on water-repellent coating sourcing is the critical gap for this product category.

How it compares in its category

Most hiking pants in this price range (mid-market outdoor apparel) still use conventional PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments. Competitors like Arc'teryx, REI Co-op, and some Patagonia lines increasingly offer PFAS-free alternatives, though at higher cost. Columbia's lack of transparency places Silver Ridge in the cautious zone relative to sustainability-conscious brands, though not exceptionally worse than generic outdoor retailers. The nylon blend itself is standard; water-repellent coating chemistry is the differentiator.

If you buy it

Contact Columbia customer service directly to request water-repellent coating chemistry confirmation before purchase. Wash pants separately in cool water before first wear to minimize any residual finish particles. Avoid heat drying, which can volatilize or degrade coating integrity. Replace when water-repellent coating visibly degrades (water beads poorly) rather than re-treating at home with uncontrolled products. If PFAS concerns are a priority, request a refund pending disclosure or choose a brand with confirmed fluorine-free water-repellent coating.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Hiking Pants

Columbia Women's All Seasons Pull-On Pants

Columbia

Women's All Seasons Pull-On Pants

Nylon/polyester blend knit, no stated water-repellent finish

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade47Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70

Low-medium risk due to basic textile construction without brand transparency.

Risky category by default

Columbia Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants

Columbia

Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants

cotton-blend chino twill (no water-repellent treatment noted)

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade59Good
🎨

Azo dyes (synthetic colorants)

Limited concern

70

Low-medium risk; basic chino without reported water or stain treatment and no PFAS disclosure.

Risky category by default

More hiking pants grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.