PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
3-Comp 200 Pack Compostable Disposable Food Containers with Lids

Compose · Food Packaging

3-Comp 200 Pack Compostable Disposable Food Containers with Lids

Poor

Avoid until the brand reveals its coating chemistry publicly.

Verdict: SkipCompostable containers avoid many plastic hazards but PFAS-coated grease resistance and silent brand disclosure warrant cautious use only with cool foods.

Compostable containers often use fluorine-free grease barriers, but this brand provides zero coating transparency. Compostability certification doesn't guarantee PFAS absence, as many compostable products contain PFAS alternatives in their grease layers.

The safe swap

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

Bagasse

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Compostable resin blend (likely PLA/PBAT) with grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Grease-resistant coatings on compostable food containers typically contain fluorinated chemicals; Compose's refusal to disclose coating chemistry is consistent with use of legacy or emerging PFAS alternatives. This is the primary non-PFAS hazard of concern for this product class.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

PLA polymer migration at elevated temperatures

PLA has a lower glass transition temperature than conventional plastics (around 140°F); exposure to hot foods or liquids can increase leaching of oligomers and residual monomers. No recalls or widespread reports exist, but use below recommended temperature limits is prudent.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🫧

Microplastics

No established reports of microplastic shedding from compostable food containers in normal use. Risk is primarily in landfill or marine persistence if not industrially composted, not in the food itself during intended use.

Source: EPA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

PLA/PBAT blends do not require formaldehyde-based resins or flame retardants. Off-gassing is not a documented concern for this material class, unlike conventional polystyrene or certain recycled plastics.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No known reports of heavy metal contamination in mainstream compostable food container products. Compose does not disclose pigment or additive sources, but no recalls or testing alerts exist for this brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These containers are made from a blend of PLA (polylactic acid, corn-based) and PBAT (polybutylene adipate terephthalate, biodegradable polyester), designed to break down in industrial composting. The grease-resistant coating is the critical unknown: most food service compostable containers use fluorinated coatings (PFAS chemicals) to repel oils and prevent leaching, even though compostable materials themselves are less prone to leaching than conventional plastics. Compose has not publicly disclosed its coating chemistry, which is a red flag for transparency in this product class.

The brand's record and disclosure

Compose's public stance on PFAS and coating chemistry is silent across available sources. The brand does not list certifications like OK Compost or explicit non-PFAS commitments on its product pages. This lack of transparency is particularly concerning because grease-resistant coatings are the primary source of PFAS in food packaging, and compostable material manufacturers vary widely in their coating choices. Without third-party testing or manufacturer disclosure, you cannot verify whether this product contains legacy PFAS (like PFOA) or newer alternatives that may carry similar persistence concerns.

How it compares in its category

Compostable food containers are generally safer than conventional plastic in terms of BPA and phthalate exposure, since PLA/PBAT formulations do not require these chemicals. However, they still rely on grease-resistant coatings, and many competing brands (such as World Centric or Footprint) explicitly state non-PFAS coatings or carry OK Compost certification as a transparency marker. Compose's silence on this point places it below the transparency baseline of responsible competitors in the compostable segment.

If you buy it

Use these containers only for room-temperature or lukewarm foods; do not microwave or expose to hot liquids above 140°F, as heat can increase migration of coating chemicals into food or degradation of the base polymer. Compost them in an industrial facility (not backyard compost), since home conditions will not break down PLA/PBAT adequately. Replace any containers showing visible cracks, discoloration, or grease saturation, as these are signs the coating is failing. If the product ends up in landfill or marine environments, it will persist for decades despite the compostable label.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Compose has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.