PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
World Centric Compostable NoTree Paper Rectangular Containers

World Centric · Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable NoTree Paper Rectangular Containers

Poor

Avoid until the brand details its barrier-coating formula; waterproof paper often contains PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPlant-based fiber is safer than plastic, but unspecified grease barrier coating likely contains PFAS; use only for dry/room-temperature foods until brand discloses formula.

These plant-based containers claim compostability and PFAS-free status in some marketing, but the brand hasn't publicly specified what chemistry protects against grease and moisture. Oil-repellent paper coatings historically use PFAS compounds without third-party verification.

The safe swap

Earth-to-go Earth Bowl EB-32

Earthwise

Earth-to-go Earth Bowl EB-32

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Plant-based paper (NoTree fiber); grease/moisture barrier coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Unspecified grease barrier on food-contact paper typically contains fluorochemicals or other synthetic coatings; migration risk increases with heat, acidity, or fatty foods. Brand silence on this is atypical in a category where competitors advertise PFAS-free alternatives.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

Degradation and barrier failure

Plant-based fibers are more moisture-sensitive than plastic; if the coating delaminates or breaks down in humid storage or use, grease can saturate the paper and compromise food safety. No public data on shelf life or degradation timeline for this specific product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Ink or printing additives

If containers have printed branding or labels, inks and adhesives may leach into food, especially hot or acidic items. World Centric does not specify ink type (soy-based vs. petroleum-based) in available materials.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Microbial growth in coating

Paper-based materials can harbor bacteria if not dried quickly after use; however, no recalls or reported incidents specific to World Centric containers. Standard food safety hygiene (rinse, dry, store cool) mitigates this risk.

95/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Plant-based fiber itself does not contain BPA or BPS. However, if the barrier coating includes synthetic polymers (polyethylene, polystyrene) as a secondary layer, those could release trace endocrine disruptors. Coating composition must be confirmed.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

World Centric NoTree containers are made from plant-based fiber (likely agricultural residue or sugarcane pulp) rather than virgin wood or plastic, which eliminates microplastic shedding and plastic-derived toxins. The critical unknown is the grease and moisture barrier coating applied to the paper; these coatings are typically fluorochemical-based (PFAS) or silicone. NoTree fiber itself is cellulose-based and poses minimal leaching risk for food contact at room temperature, but the coating's composition determines actual safety for fatty or hot foods.

The brand's record and disclosure

Compostable Coffee markets environmental credentials heavily but does not publicly disclose the specific chemistry of its grease-barrier coating, which is a significant transparency gap for food safety. The brand has no known recalls or regulatory actions on record for this product. However, the silent stance on PFAS or alternative barrier technology is a red flag; competitors in the compostable foodware space increasingly specify 'PFAS-free' or use wax-based barriers as a selling point, suggesting industry knowledge of consumer concern.

How it compares in its category

Compostable paper containers occupy a middle ground: safer than conventional plastic clamshells (no BPA/phthalates, no microplastics) but riskier than explicitly PFAS-free alternatives (some compostable brands now use silicone or plant-based wax). They are compostable under industrial conditions (typically 140F+, controlled moisture/microbes), which is a genuine environmental advantage over plastic, but this does not guarantee the coating is low-toxicity. Uncoated paper containers are available but unsuitable for greasy foods.

If you buy it

Use these containers only for dry foods or foods at room temperature; do not microwave or fill with hot liquids or fatty foods (pizza, fried items) until the coating is verified PFAS-free. Store in a cool, dry place; moisture exposure can degrade the barrier and increase leaching risk. Replace containers if they show visible wear, discoloration, or water spots. If the brand does not publish coating details within 6 months of inquiry, switch to a competitor with transparent PFAS-free certification (e.g., containers labeled 'PFAS-free' or 'plant-based wax barrier').

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
World Centric has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.