PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
Dart Compostable Rectangular Fiber Take-Out Container 30-32 oz. 300/Case

Dart Container · Food Packaging

Dart Compostable Rectangular Fiber Take-Out Container 30-32 oz. 300/Case

Poor

Wait for transparent coating information. Compostable fiber containers frequently use fluorinated barriers.

Verdict: SkipFiber compostable containers pose unknown coating risks (likely PFAS-based barriers) and lack brand transparency; suitable only with full awareness of fluorochemical uncertainty.

Dart markets compostable fiber containers but stays silent on the moisture and grease-resistant coating formula. Industry practice often relies on fluorinated PFAS coatings for this function.

The safe swap

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

Bagasse

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Fiber pulp (compostable) with unspecified moisture/grease barrier coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The unspecified grease-barrier coating is statistically likely to contain PFAS or PFAS-like fluorochemicals based on industry-standard formulations for compostable fiber. Dart has not publicly committed to PFAS-free alternatives or disclosed coating identity. Migration into fatty or acidic foods is plausible under stress (prolonged contact, heat).

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Barrier chemical migration on heating

Even if the coating is non-fluorinated (polyester, wax, or PFAS-free alternatives), heating or microwave use can promote migration of coating monomers or additives into food. No independent testing of this specific product under thermal stress is publicly available.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mold or bacterial colonization if wet-stored

Fiber pulp is hygroscopic and can harbor mold or bacterial growth if stored damp or in humid conditions before use. This is a general food-contact concern for fiber-based packaging but is not specific to Dart's product quality.

70/ 100
⚠️

Lack of compostability in home or landfill conditions

Compostable fiber containers marketed as such typically require industrial composting (55-60 C, 12+ weeks) to degrade. In home compost or landfill, they persist and may not break down, defeating the environmental claim and potentially accumulating in soil or waste streams.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Microplastic or fiber fragment shedding

Molded fiber containers can shed small pulp or coating particles, especially if the surface degrades over time or if the coating delaminates. No reported incidents exist for this product, but mechanical wear of barrier coatings in food contact is a theoretical concern in long-term use.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This product is molded fiber pulp (recycled paper/plant fiber) designed to be compostable, but the critical unknown is the moisture and grease barrier coating applied to the interior. Uncoated fiber absorbs liquids rapidly and fails structurally with greasy foods. Dart does not publicly specify the coating chemistry on this product line. The barrier is most likely a fluorinated compound (PFAS-based) or, less commonly, a non-fluorinated polyester or wax blend, but without disclosure, the actual composition is opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dart Container is a major foodservice packaging manufacturer with no publicly available detailed transparency on fluorochemical content in their compostable fiber lines. The company has not issued voluntary PFAS phase-out commitments comparable to some competitors. Industry-wide, many compostable fiber manufacturers have faced pressure to disclose or eliminate PFAS in barriers, but Dart's stance remains silent on this specific product. No major recalls or safety incidents are on record for this container type from Dart.

How it compares in its category

Compostable fiber containers like this occupy a middle ground: they avoid rigid plastics and polystyrene, but introduce coating uncertainty absent in plain cardboard or molded pulp without barriers. Comparable products from Footprint and some store brands increasingly disclose non-fluorinated or PFAS-free barrier options, whereas Dart has not. Uncoated paper containers eliminate coating risk but fail with oily foods. Traditional polypropylene or PET rigid clamshells have known chemistry but are non-compostable.

If you buy it

Use for dry or minimal-moisture foods (baked goods, salads without dressing) rather than greasy or hot items to rely on the barrier minimally. Do not microwave or heat; compostable coatings may release monomers or barrier chemicals when heated, especially if coating is fluorinated. If composting at home, these containers require industrial composting conditions to break down properly and will persist in landfill. Request Dart's safety data sheet (SDS) or coating specification to know what you are using; silence on this issue is a legitimate reason for caution.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dart Container has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.