PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad
Eco-Products 3-Compartment Sugarcane Clamshells

Eco-Products · Food Packaging

Eco-Products 3-Compartment Sugarcane Clamshells

Poor

Wait for Eco-Products to disclose coating contents or provide PFAS-free certification.

Verdict: SkipSugarcane clamshells avoid many plastic hazards but coating chemistry is undisclosed; safe for cold/room-temp food only pending PFAS clarification.

Sugarcane clamshells are naturally lower-risk than plastic, but Eco-Products doesn't reveal what water and grease-resistant coatings they use. Ask the brand about coating details before buying.

The safe swap

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Sugarcane fiber (bagasse) clamshell with unspecified coating/barrier

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
🍳

Coating leachates (unspecified barrier composition)

Bagasse clamshells require a functional coating to provide water and grease resistance for food contact. Eco-Products has not disclosed the specific resin, wax, or chemical formulation used, so potential leaching of adhesives, plasticizers, or oligomers into fatty or acidic foods cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
💨

Thermal degradation and off-gassing

Heating bagasse-based clamshells above recommended temperatures (typically 120-130 degrees Celsius) may cause the coating to soften, crack, or release volatile organic compounds. These products are not designed for hot food or microwave use, but consumer misuse is common.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic or fiber shedding

Under mechanical stress or prolonged contact with acidic foods, the fiber matrix can degrade microscopically, potentially releasing small fiber fragments into food. This is less documented than plastic microplastic risk but is a concern inherent to all fiber-based food-contact materials.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

No recalls or published testing have identified BPA or bisphenol S in Eco-Products sugarcane clamshells. However, absence of testing reports does not confirm absence of these compounds in the proprietary coating formulation.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are common in fiber-based food packaging coatings, but no specific data on this product exists in public records. Eco-Products' silence on this point leaves room for concern if the coating is a phenol-formaldehyde or urea-formaldehyde system.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Eco-Products clamshells are made from bagasse, the fibrous residue left after sugarcane juice extraction. This is a compostable plant fiber alternative to polystyrene foam or plastic clamshells. Bagasse itself is chemically inert, but commercial food-contact bagasse products typically receive a barrier coating (often wax, clay, or resin-based) to provide moisture and grease resistance. The specific coating used here is not publicly disclosed by Eco-Products, which creates uncertainty about potential leachates into food, particularly fatty or acidic items.

The brand's record and disclosure

Eco-Products positions itself as an environmental leader and offers compostable food service packaging across many product lines. However, the brand has not published detailed ingredient disclosures or independent testing reports for their sugarcane clamshell coatings. No formal BPA, phthalate, or PFAS certifications are prominently advertised for this product. The silent stance on PFAS is consistent with limited transparency in the compostable packaging sector, where coating formulations are often proprietary.

How it compares in its category

Sugarcane bagasse clamshells occupy a middle ground: they avoid styrene off-gassing from foam and do not introduce petroleum-derived plastics, but they are not inherently safer than well-regulated plastic clamshells (which have established FDA oversight) because their coatings are less standardized. Fiber-based clamshells from certified sources (e.g., those with NSF or Cradle to Cradle certification) offer more assurance than unspecified alternatives. Eco-Products' lack of third-party coating certification puts them below fully transparent competitors in this category.

If you buy it

Use these clamshells for cold and room-temperature foods only; do not microwave or expose to high heat, as the coating may degrade or leach unknowns under thermal stress. Store dry before use, as prolonged moisture exposure can weaken the fiber structure. Replace if visible coating damage (flaking, peeling) occurs. Request Eco-Products provide a technical data sheet confirming the coating chemistry and PFAS status before routine purchase if you have sensitivity concerns.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Eco-Products has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.