PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Dart Compostable Fiber Hinged Containers ProPlanet Seal 6.34 x 9.06 x 1.97

· Food Packaging

Dart Compostable Fiber Hinged Containers ProPlanet Seal 6.34 x 9.06 x 1.97

Poor

Skip until coating chemistry is disclosed, compostable fiber often contains fluorinated treatments.

Verdict: SkipUndisclosed fluorinated coating chemistry combined with poor PFAS safety grade makes this container unsuitable until Footprint publishes full coating details.

Dart compostable hinged containers market themselves as eco-friendly without disclosing grease and water-resistant coating chemistry. Food-contact fiber packaging commonly relies on PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes.

The safe swap

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

fiber-based container with grease/water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Fiber food containers almost universally rely on fluorinated treatments for water and grease resistance; Footprint's silence on this and the poor PFAS safety rating strongly suggest their standard formulation contains PFAS compounds that can migrate into food and accumulate in the body.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

Coating degradation under heat or acid exposure

Fiber-based coatings are vulnerable to breakdown when exposed to hot foods, acidic contents, or microwave heating. If the coating degrades, fibers may shed into food and the protective barrier is lost, allowing direct contact between food and potentially treated fiber substrate.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic or fiber shedding into food

If the water/grease-resistant coating deteriorates over time or during use, small fiber particles or coating fragments may shed into food, especially liquid or fatty foods. The long-term health impact of ingesting small quantities of coated food-service fibers is not well-established.

70/ 100
🏷️

Compostability claim versus actual biodegradation timeline

Compostable certifications (such as ASTM D6868) require breakdown in industrial composting at 58 degrees Celsius, a condition not met in home compost or most municipal systems. Fluorinated coatings may also resist microbial breakdown, delaying or preventing decomposition even in industrial facilities.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Undisclosed chemical residues in fiber pulp source

Fiber-based containers may contain trace bleach, sizing agents, or other processing chemicals from the pulp manufacturing process. Footprint does not disclose pulp sourcing or residual chemical testing, so contamination risk cannot be assessed.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a fiber-based hinged clamshell container (likely molded pulp or paperboard) with a grease and water-resistant coating applied to the interior surfaces. Fiber containers require chemical coatings to prevent oil and moisture from seeping through the porous substrate, but many manufacturers use fluorinated treatments (PFAS compounds) for this purpose because they are highly effective and inexpensive. Footprint's ProPlanet Seal branding suggests environmental positioning, but the actual coating chemistry is not publicly disclosed, leaving the PFAS status opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Footprint is a publicly traded packaging company that markets sustainability but has not published specific coating formulations or PFAS content statements for this product line despite growing industry scrutiny. The company has faced investor and NGO pressure on PFAS use in food-contact packaging but has not committed to phase-out timelines or full ingredient transparency. Their silence on coating chemistry is notable given competitors in the compostable/sustainable space have begun disclosing this information voluntarily.

How it compares in its category

Compostable fiber hinged containers are marketed as greener alternatives to plastic clamshells, but many still rely on fluorinated coatings to meet grease-resistance standards required for hot or oily foods. Some manufacturers (e.g., World Centric, some Huhtamaki lines) have published non-fluorinated coating alternatives, though these typically cost more and have narrower temperature/grease tolerance. Footprint's refusal to disclose coating type puts this product at the lower end of transparency compared to certified compostable options with published chemical statements.

If you buy it

Do not use for extended contact with hot or fatty foods; the coating's performance under heat stress is unknown and could degrade, allowing fibers to absorb oil. Store dry and do not microwave or place in conventional ovens. If purchasing, request a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for the coating from Footprint directly; lack of response confirms non-disclosure. Consider switching to fiber containers from brands that publish PFAS-free or third-party-tested coating certifications.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.