PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
New Roots Kraft PLA-Lined Compostable #4 Take-Out Container 7 3/4" x 5 1/2" x 3 1/2" - 160/Case

Footprint · Food Packaging

New Roots Kraft PLA-Lined Compostable #4 Take-Out Container 7 3/4" x 5 1/2" x 3 1/2" - 160/Case

Poor

Lower concern, but verify coating composition directly with brand first.

Verdict: SkipPLA containers are generally low-toxicity but degrade under heat/acidic foods; verify fluorochemical coatings with Footprint directly before high-volume use.

PLA-lined compostable containers avoid Teflon-family coating coatings, but kraft paper lining may have received water and grease-resistant treatment. Footprint provides no public PFAS policies or testing.

The safe swap

Plant Plates

Plate Mate

Plant Plates

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

PLA bioplastic with kraft paper lining

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Kraft linings in compostable containers often use water- and grease-resistant treatments that may contain perfluorinated or polyfluorinated compounds. Footprint does not publicly disclose coating composition; direct inquiry required to confirm whether fluorine-free alternatives are used on this #4 model.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

PLA containers are documented in peer-reviewed studies to release small quantities of lactide oligomers into foods, particularly fatty and acidic items when heated. This is generally considered low-risk at typical exposure levels, but leaching increases substantially above 50°C.

45/ 100

Thermal degradation and structural failure

PLA softens and warps noticeably at temperatures above 55-60°C, well below typical hot-food serving ranges. This can lead to container failure, spills, and potential contamination; it is not suitable for hot soup, beverages, or foods requiring heat retention.

20/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from kraft fiber breakdown

Prolonged contact with liquids or mechanical wear can cause kraft fibers to separate and enter food. The extent depends on coating integrity and storage duration; short-term use poses minimal risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

PLA does not contain BPA, BPS, or phthalate plasticizers by formulation. This product is safer in this regard than conventional polycarbonate and vinyl alternatives.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This container is PLA (polylactic acid), a bioplastic derived from corn or sugarcane, lined with kraft paper. PLA does not contain BPA, BPS, or traditional phthalates, making it chemically simpler than polycarbonate or vinyl alternatives. However, PLA's weakness is thermal and chemical stability: it begins softening above 50-60°C and can leach small amounts of oligomers (unpolymerized building blocks) into fatty or acidic foods, especially when warm. The kraft lining may also contain fluorochemical coatings for grease resistance, which is the main hidden hazard in this product class.

The brand's record and disclosure

Footprint is a major compostable packaging supplier founded to reduce single-use plastics and promote industrial composting. The company markets sustainability credentials but maintains limited transparency on coating chemistry; they do not publicly disclose whether their kraft linings use PFAS-containing water-repellent treatments or fluorine-free alternatives. No major product recalls or safety violations are on record for this specific product. Buyers should contact Footprint directly to confirm whether this #4 container uses fluorochemical coatings and ask for a safety data sheet (SDS) for the kraft substrate.

How it compares in its category

PLA compostable containers are chemically safer than conventional polystyrene or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for room-temperature and mildly warm foods because they avoid common plasticizer leaching. However, they are functionally weaker: PLA degrades faster under heat, UV, and prolonged storage compared to traditional plastics. Kraft-lined versions are preferable to uncoated PLA for wet or fatty foods but introduce uncertainty around fluorochemical additives. Unlined fiber containers or PLA without kraft lining are marginally safer if composting infrastructure is available.

If you buy it

Use these containers only for room-temperature or mildly warm (under 50°C / 120°F) foods; hot liquids or foods above this threshold accelerate PLA softening and oligomer migration. Avoid prolonged contact with fatty dressings, oils, or acidic sauces, which can penetrate and degrade the kraft coating. Store in cool, dark conditions; PLA becomes brittle under UV and heat over weeks to months. For industrial food service, confirm with your composting facility that they accept PLA; many municipal systems do not, making these containers contamination risks in standard recycling.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Footprint has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.