PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Better Valu Slow Cooker Liners 4 Count

Great Value · Slow Cooker Liners

Better Valu Slow Cooker Liners 4 Count

Bad

Skip; coating opaque and PFAS risk unconfirmed.

Verdict: SkipUncoated nylon liner poses microplastic release risk under heat; coating composition undisclosed raises concern. Use with caution and monitor condition.

Great Value liners use nylon or plastic-coated material without disclosed coating composition or PFAS status. Nylon and plastic liners often contain nonstick or grease-resistant treatments with PFAS.

The safe swap

Slow Cooking Liners

If You Care

Slow Cooking Liners

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon or plastic-coated cooking liner; coating composition undisclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from nylon under heat

Nylon liners, especially if coating is thin or damaged, can release microplastic particles into food when slow cooker reaches sustained temperatures above 120°C. No specific test data for this brand is publicly available.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and unknown leachates

The undisclosed coating composition means potential leaching of plasticizers, slip agents, or cross-linking chemicals is not ruled out. Repeated heating cycles degrade polymer coatings over time, increasing leaching risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

Adhesive or slip-agent contamination

Nylon liners are typically bonded to backing material using adhesives and slip agents (silicones, waxes, or polymeric surfactants) whose safety profiles are not disclosed by Great Value. Migration into hot, fatty foods is plausible.

70/ 100
⚠️

Structural failure and food contact with slow cooker surface

If the liner tears or adhesive fails during cooking, food contacts the slow cooker interior directly, which may be ceramic, stoneware, or metal with unknown glaze or coating composition.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Lack of third-party safety certification

No evidence of FDA compliance verification, NSF certification, or independent toxicology testing is publicly documented for this product line.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Better Valu slow cooker liners are marketed as nylon or plastic-coated cooking liners, but the brand does not publicly disclose the specific coating material or adhesives used. Nylon itself is a polyamide that can shed microplastics when abraded or heated above ~120°C (250°F), particularly if the coating degrades. The opacity around coating composition means potential contaminants, such as plasticizers, slip agents, or adhesion promoters, cannot be assessed from publicly available information.

The brand's record and disclosure

Great Value (Walmart's private label) has a mixed transparency record. The brand rarely publishes detailed material specifications or third-party safety certifications for disposable liners. No public statements on PFAS use, BPA avoidance, or coating durability testing are on record for this product line. Walmart has made general sustainability pledges but has not issued category-specific safety disclosures for slow cooker liners.

How it compares in its category

Slow cooker liners are generally convenience products with inherent single-use waste concerns. Premium alternatives (e.g., Reynolds, Glad) provide slightly more transparency on material composition and often claim Teflon-type coating-free or PFOA-free formulations. Budget liners like this one typically lag in disclosure. Reusable silicone liners eliminate microplastic risk but require higher upfront cost and care.

If you buy it

Follow the manufacturer's temperature guidance closely; do not use above the stated heat limit, as nylon coating degradation accelerates at high temperatures. Inspect liners before and after use for tears, cloudiness, or adhesive failure. If the liner shows visible damage or strong plastic odor, discard it. Consider rotating to reusable alternatives if you use slow cookers frequently to reduce cumulative microplastic exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Great Value has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Slow Cooker Liners

Slow Cooking Liners

If You Care

Slow Cooking Liners

Unbleached parchment paper

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent

Thermal degradation and smoke at high heat

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp

Limited concern

70
🍂

Adhesion failure and paper fragments in food

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern option; parchment with verified PFAS-free certification.

MADE SAFE Certified

Risky category by default

(2 pack) Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners, Small (1-3 quart), 5 Count

Reynolds

(2 pack) Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners, Small (1-3 quart), 5 Count

polyethylene/plastic liner

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS concern; basic plastic unlikely to contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Slow Cooker Liners - 4 Pack

Glad

Slow Cooker Liners - 4 Pack

Plastic (polyethylene or similar polymer liner)

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower concern; uncoated plastic, but Glad doesn't confirm PFAS status.

Risky category by default

More slow cooker liners grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.