PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
9 x 7 x 2.25 | 32 oz | Fiber Container 400 per case

Greensafe · Food Packaging

9 x 7 x 2.25 | 32 oz | Fiber Container 400 per case

Poor

Avoid until Greensafe explains the barrier coating materials.

Verdict: SkipFiber container with unknown barrier coating; PFAS concern dominates, but pulp-based food contact is generally low-risk for other leachables if coating is non-fluorinated.

Fiber food containers typically receive grease-resistant or waterproof coatings for food safety. Greensafe makes no public statement about what theirs contains.

The safe swap

Eco-Products 12 oz. World Art Compostable Food Containers 25-ct. pack

Eco-Products

Eco-Products 12 oz. World Art Compostable Food Containers 25-ct. pack

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Fiber-based container (likely molded pulp or coated paperboard)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Greensafe has not disclosed whether the interior moisture and grease barrier contains fluorinated compounds. Molded fiber containers often use PFOA, PFOS, or other PFAS for water resistance; absence of a public statement is a strong indicator this product may contain them.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Polyester-based or epoxy adhesives and some water-resistant resins in fiber containers may contain bisphenols. No public testing or declaration exists for this Greensafe product to rule it out.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
🍳

Chlorine residues from bleaching or coating

Recycled fiber containers may retain chlorine or chlorinated by-products from paper processing. Greensafe does not publish process details, so residual chlorine levels are unknown but typically low in food-contact applications.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some molded fiber coatings use formaldehyde-releasing resins for durability. Greensafe has not disclosed use of formaldehyde-free or low-emission alternatives, so minimal exposure is likely but not guaranteed.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Microplastic or fiber shedding

Fiber containers do not shed microplastics like synthetic polymers. If the coating is stable and not damaged, fiber and coating particles are unlikely to migrate into food under normal cold or room-temperature use.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a molded fiber or coated paperboard container, likely designed for hot or cold food service. The fiber substrate itself (recycled paper pulp) is stable and does not leach chemicals under normal use. The critical unknown is the barrier coating applied to the interior surface to resist moisture and grease. If that coating contains PFAS (fluorinated compounds for water and oil repellency), it poses the primary chemical risk; if it does not, the container presents minimal leaching hazard from the base material.

The brand's record and disclosure

Greensafe has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of barrier coatings in their fiber containers or committed to PFAS-free formulations. No certifications (compostability, food safety standards, or chemical safety audits) are established in public records for this specific product line. The brand's silence on PFAS is a red flag, as competitors increasingly publish coating specifications or pursue third-party verification. Without direct contact with Greensafe, you cannot verify whether the coating is PFAS-based.

How it compares in its category

Molded fiber containers are a growing alternative to polystyrene and plastic clamshells. They rank lower in chemical leaching risk than plastics if coatings are PFAS-free, but they rank higher in uncertainty when manufacturers do not disclose. Brands like Footprint and some regional suppliers have begun publishing coating-free or PFAS-free claims; Greensafe's silence puts it behind the transparency curve. The bulk purchase (400 per case) suggests commercial food service use, where PFAS exposure multiplied across customers increases the concern.

If you buy it

Do not use with hot or high-fat foods unless you confirm the coating is PFAS-free (contact Greensafe directly). Cold foods and dry goods carry lower leaching risk. Avoid microwaving or heating the container. Replace containers after 1-2 years of storage use, as any coating can degrade. Request a safety data sheet (SDS) or material declaration from the supplier before large purchases; silence is grounds for substitution to a brand with published coating chemistry.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Greensafe has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.