PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Huhtamaki Soup Food Containers w/Vented Lids

Huhtamaki · Food Packaging

Huhtamaki Soup Food Containers w/Vented Lids

Poor

Avoid or contact Huhtamaki. Grease-resistant food containers often contain PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-coated food containers with silent manufacturer stance and no independent safety certification. Better alternatives exist.

Huhtamaki soup containers use molded fiber with water and grease-resistant coating typical of food service ware. Such coatings historically contain PFAS, though Huhtamaki makes no public disclosure.

The safe swap

Eco-Products WorldView Renewable Sugarcane Containers 16 oz

Eco-Products

Eco-Products WorldView Renewable Sugarcane Containers 16 oz

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Molded fiber/paperboard with liquid repellent coating (likely fluorochemical)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Molded fiber food containers with 'grease-resistant' coatings typically contain legacy PFAS formulations (PFOA, PFOS, or shorter-chain replacements). Hot or acidic foods like soups accelerate migration into the product. Huhtamaki has not disclosed coating chemistry or PFAS status.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

Thermal breakdown of coating

If accidentally heated (microwave exposure), fluorochemical coatings may degrade and release degradation byproducts into food. No data on this specific product is publicly available, but the risk exists for any PFAS-coated molded fiber used in hot service.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic and fiber shedding

Molded fiber containers can shed microscopic paper fibers and coating particles, especially if the interior coating is compromised or worn. This is more a durability and cleanliness concern than acute toxicity, but repeated use or rough handling increases shedding risk.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating adhesion loss over time

Molded fiber coatings (particularly PFAS-based) are known in industry literature to delaminate or peel with storage, moisture exposure, or repeated use cycles. Peeling coating can shed into food.

45/ 100
⚠️

No independent food safety certification

The product does not carry public certifications (e.g., NSF, FDA premarket notification, or third-party PFAS testing). This is not proof of hazard but reflects lack of transparent safety assurance to consumers.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Huhtamaki Soup Food Containers use molded fiber (pressed paper pulp) as the base material, which is inherently compostable and food-safe. The critical component is the liquid repellent coating applied to the interior surface, which in this product class is almost certainly a fluorochemical (PFAS-based) formulation designed to prevent grease and moisture from penetrating the porous fiber. This coating directly contacts hot or warm food, creating a potential migration pathway for PFAS into liquids and semi-solid foods, especially soups where extended contact time increases leaching risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Huhtamaki is a major global food packaging manufacturer but maintains public silence on PFAS content in their food containers and has not published commitments to phase out fluorochemical coatings. The company does not offer transparent ingredient disclosure or third-party certification for PFAS-free formulations on this product line. No major recalls or documented contamination incidents specific to this brand are on public record, but the absence of proactive communication about a known hazard in an industry under regulatory scrutiny is a transparency red flag.

How it compares in its category

Most disposable molded fiber food containers in the market contain PFAS-based water and grease repellent coatings, making this a category-wide issue rather than a Huhtamaki-specific failure. However, some manufacturers (such as Footprint and smaller eco-focused brands) now offer PFAS-free alternatives using plant-based or non-fluorinated repellent systems, though availability and cost vary regionally. Choosing uncoated fiber containers for dry foods or certified PFAS-free options for liquids shifts risk significantly lower.

If you buy it

Do not heat these containers in microwave or oven, as elevated temperature accelerates PFAS migration from the coating into food. Use only for room-temperature or briefly warm foods (under 40 degrees Celsius / 104 degrees Fahrenheit); soups should be transferred to ceramic or glass vessels before heating or cooling. Replace containers immediately if the interior coating shows peeling, discoloration, or visible wear, as degradation increases leachable material. Consider these a single-use product; do not reuse or wash and reuse, as this degrades the coating further.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Huhtamaki has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.