Paper Mart Naturenow Compostable Hoagie Sze Cont 9 X 6 X 3-1/4
Skip; compostable food packaging often uses PFAS-based water and grease barriers without brand transparency.
Notpla markets this as compostable, yet compostable food containers frequently use fluorinated coatings for grease and moisture resistance. No PFAS-free status or testing is publicly disclosed.
The safe swap
Sprout
Compostable Takeout Container Pack Plant-Based & Sustainable
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Compostable fiber/pulp with grease-resistant coating (unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
PFAS
No chemical disclosure provided; compostable fiber packaging commonly uses PFAS-based or fluorinated barriers. Without specification, assume possible presence of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) or similar compounds used in water and grease resistance.
Source: ATSDR ↗Microplastic or fiber migration when heated or damaged
Fiber pulp containers can shed fibers if the coating degrades or if exposed to heat above 60°C. While not technically plastic, pulp fiber fragments in food present a choking risk for young children and may carry coating chemicals.
Coating leachables (unidentified composition)
The grease-resistant layer is not chemically specified by the brand. Unknown proprietary coatings may include uncertified additives, plasticizers, or polyols that could leach into fatty or acidic foods.
Insufficient degradation in non-industrial settings
Compostable-certified containers require industrial composting (55-60°C, controlled moisture and aeration). If disposed in landfill or home compost, the coating and fibers persist for years, offering no environmental or safety advantage.
Brand transparency gap
Notpla does not publish ingredient lists, third-party test results, or explicit PFAS statements. This absence of disclosure is a documented pattern across some compostable brands and prevents informed consumer assessment.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This container is molded fiber (recycled paper pulp) with a grease-resistant coating applied to the interior surface. Compostable fiber food packaging typically requires a water and oil barrier to prevent soaking and collapse during use; these coatings are where PFAS chemicals often hide. Notpla's product literature does not specify the coating chemistry, which is a red flag given that many compostable-certified containers still rely on PFAS-based polymers or fluorinated compounds rather than safer alternatives like polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) or wax.
The brand's record and disclosure
Notpla markets itself as an eco-friendly compostable packaging brand but provides no public technical data sheets, third-party testing results, or explicit statements ruling out PFAS in their coatings. The brand holds certifications (likely EN 13432 or similar compostability standards), but compostability certification does not mandate PFAS-free formulation. No published recalls or safety controversies are on record, but the absence of transparent chemical disclosure is itself a governance gap that suggests either lack of awareness or intentional opacity.
How it compares in its category
Compostable fiber containers occupy a growing market segment as alternatives to polystyrene foam and plastic clamshells. Many competitors (including some Notpla alternatives and brands like World Centric) now explicitly state PFAS-free coatings or use certified PHA-based barriers. This Notpla product sits in the middle tier: genuinely compostable and more sustainable than conventional plastic, but behind category leaders that combine compostability with transparent chemical sourcing and PFAS avoidance.
If you buy it
Use the container for room-temperature or moderately warm foods (up to 50-60°C); do not microwave or place in direct oven heat, as degradation of the coating could accelerate leaching. Dispose through industrial composting facilities where available rather than home compost, since the coating may not break down in cool home piles. Replace immediately if the interior shows discoloration, softening, or visible wear. For frequent use (e.g., food service), consider switching to verified PFAS-free alternatives such as World Centric or uncoated cardboard with PHA liners.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Food Packaging
World Centric
Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers
Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating
Proprietary coating chemical migration
Limited concern
Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix
Limited concern
Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods
Moderate concern
Recycling contamination if misdisposed
Limited concern
Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Vegware
Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box
Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings
Coating degradation under heat and moisture
Limited concern
Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Loliware
Compostable Hinged Deli Containers
Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings
PLA oligomer leaching
Limited concern
Microplastic generation on degradation
Limited concern
Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More food packaging grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.