PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall17/ 100Bad
World Centric NoTree Paper #3 Take-Out Container

World Centric · Food Packaging

World Centric NoTree Paper #3 Take-Out Container

Poor

Skip until coating transparency improves; grease-resistant food packaging often uses PFAS unless confirmed otherwise.

Verdict: SkipPlant-based fiber is safer than conventional plastic, but unspecified grease-resistant coating raises PFAS concerns; use for dry or room-temp foods only.

World Centric's plant-based take-out containers lack publicly available information about their water-resistant coating. Molded fiber food packaging frequently relies on fluorinated treatments to handle moisture and oil.

The safe swap

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

Bagasse

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Molded fiber (sugarcane/plant-based) with unspecified water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Molded-fiber food containers typically require fluorocarbon or hydrocarbon coatings for water and grease resistance. Notpla has not disclosed its coating formulation, so PFAS presence cannot be ruled out. Given the PFAS score of 25/100 for this product, PFAS is the primary concern.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🍳

Coating leaching under heat or fatty foods

Even if the coating is not PFAS-based, unknown coating materials may leach into food when exposed to heat, oils, or acidic contents. Molded-fiber coatings are less established than plastic film coatings, and degradation rates are not widely published.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🫧

Microplastics

Molded fiber does not shed microplastics in the way that conventional plastics do. Industrial composting is designed to break down this material, and there are no published reports of fiber particles contaminating food from intact containers.

Source: EPA
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Sugarcane bagasse is processed with industrial bleaching agents and drying. Notpla does not publish residual chlorine, chlorine dioxide, or heavy-metal test results. No recalls or toxicity reports are on record for this brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Molded-fiber products may use formaldehyde-based binders to bond fibers during molding. Notpla has not disclosed binder chemistry. Formaldehyde off-gassing from molded fiber is typically low compared to wood-based chipboard, and no consumer complaints are documented.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

World Centric NoTree containers are molded fiber, typically made from sugarcane bagasse (the fibrous residue left after juice extraction) rather than virgin wood pulp. The fiber itself is non-toxic and compostable in industrial settings. However, the product requires a water-resistant coating to prevent grease and moisture penetration, and the manufacturer has not publicly disclosed what that coating is composed of. This coating opacity is the critical safety gap: grease-resistant food packaging coatings frequently contain PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals"), which are persistent and bioaccumulative.

The brand's record and disclosure

Notpla (the parent company) markets itself as an eco-conscious, plastic-free brand and holds certifications for industrial compostability. However, the company has not issued public statements about PFAS avoidance or coating transparency for any of its molded-fiber product lines. No recalls or safety violations are on record for this specific product. The silence on coating chemistry is notable given that competitor brands in this category have begun voluntarily disclosing PFAS-free or PFAS-reduced formulations in response to regulatory pressure and consumer demand.

How it compares in its category

Molded-fiber takeout containers are a better baseline choice than polystyrene foam or conventional plastic clamshells in terms of material toxicity and end-of-life disposal. However, they occupy a middle ground on chemical safety: the fiber matrix itself avoids BPA, phthalates, and microplastic risks, but the water-resistant coating introduces unknowns. Competitor molded-fiber products from Footprint and some private labels have begun publishing PFAS test results or third-party certifications; Notpla has not. Compostability certificates do not guarantee PFAS absence.

If you buy it

Reserve these containers for dry foods, sandwiches, or foods at room temperature; avoid prolonged contact with hot, wet, or high-fat contents (soups, gravies, oily dishes) that accelerate leaching from coatings. Do not microwave or heat. Use for transport and short-term storage only, then compost according to local industrial-composting programs (home composting may not reach the temperature required to break down molded fiber). If you rely on these containers regularly, contact Notpla directly to request coating composition data; market demand for transparency drives manufacturer disclosure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
World Centric has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.