PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Compostable Takeout Containers

Tanimura & Antle · Food Packaging

Compostable Takeout Containers

Poor

Avoid until coating chemistry is disclosed; compostable containers often use PFAS barriers.

Verdict: SkipPFAS barrier coating unconfirmed; plant-based fiber itself low-risk, but coating chemistry must be disclosed before confident use.

Plant-fiber compostable containers lack public disclosure of their waterproof coating. Industry-standard compostable packaging frequently uses fluorinated barriers like Teflon-type coating or PFOA alternatives to achieve grease and moisture resistance without lab verification.

The safe swap

Eco-Products WorldView Renewable Sugarcane Containers 16 oz

Eco-Products

Eco-Products WorldView Renewable Sugarcane Containers 16 oz

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Plant-based fiber/pulp with waterproof barrier coating (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Fluorinated water-resistant coatings are standard in compostable takeout containers. Tanimura & Antle's silence on coating composition and the category's known PFAS prevalence suggest this product likely contains PFAS unless proven otherwise. Migration into fatty or acidic foods is possible, especially if stored warm or long-term.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🍳

Other synthetic polymer or fluorinated additives in coating

Even if PFAS-free, undisclosed barrier coatings may contain other halogenated or synthetic compounds (e.g., polyurethanes, acrylates) that can leach under stress or heat. Without ingredient transparency, substitution risks cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

If the barrier coating is polymer-based or synthetic, mechanical stress (cutting, folding, microwaving) or aging can cause the coating layer to flake or degrade into food. This risk is heightened for containers stored improperly or reused multiple times.

70/ 100
🍳

Incomplete industrial composability due to coating residue

Many compostable container coatings, especially fluorinated or synthetic barriers, fragment rather than fully biodegrade in standard industrial composting, leaving plastic-like particles in finished compost. This undermines the 'compostable' label's environmental value and may introduce microplastics into soil.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Bisphenol A or other phenolic compounds in adhesives or processing

No specific reports link Tanimura & Antle containers to BPA or BPS, but plant-fiber processing and coating application may involve phenolic or epoxy-based adhesives. Without material safety data sheets, this cannot be confirmed as absent.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Tanimura & Antle's compostable containers are constructed from plant-based fiber or pulp (likely sugarcane bagasse, wheat straw, or wood pulp) rather than foam or plastic. The critical unknown is the waterproof barrier coating applied to make them grease- and moisture-resistant. Plant fiber alone is porous and unsuitable for wet or oily foods without a sealant. The coating chemistry is not publicly disclosed by the brand, which is a major transparency gap in an industry where PFAS-based coatings are common.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tanimura & Antle, a produce distributor, has not issued public statements about the specific chemistry of their compostable container coatings, including whether PFAS, other fluorinated compounds, or synthetic polymers are used. The company has not obtained third-party certifications (such as OK Compost Industrial or certification from the Biodegradable Products Institute) that would typically require disclosure of coating materials. This silence in a product category where PFAS use is documented represents a significant red flag for informed purchasing.

How it compares in its category

Many major compostable takeout container brands (including World Centric and some retailers' private labels) have begun disclosing PFAS-free coatings or shifting to alternative barrier systems. However, industry-wide adoption of PFAS alternatives remains incomplete, and smaller suppliers like Tanimura & Antle's foodservice division have not matched this transparency. Plant-based fiber containers without PFAS barriers exist but are less common; most compostable options still rely on undisclosed or fluorinated coatings.

If you buy it

Before use, contact Tanimura & Antle directly to request written confirmation that the barrier coating is PFAS-free and specify which alternative sealant is used. Store containers in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to minimize coating degradation. Do not use for foods heated above 70 degrees Celsius (158 degrees Fahrenheit) in the container itself, as heat can compromise the barrier and increase leaching risk. Compost only in industrial facilities that accept coated fiber; home composting may not break down the sealant layer completely.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tanimura & Antle has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.