PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall9/ 100Bad
World Centric TR-SC-UAR-LFS, 20 oz Compostable Fiber Take-Out Container (600/Case)

World Centric · Food Packaging

World Centric TR-SC-UAR-LFS, 20 oz Compostable Fiber Take-Out Container (600/Case)

Poor

Lower-risk compostable option, but coating type unclear and PFAS status not disclosed.

Verdict: SkipCompostable fiber with undisclosed PFAS-based grease coating; suitable for cold/warm food if coating integrity maintained, but transparency gap and PFAS uncertainty warrant cautious use.

These compostable fiber containers are marketed as plant-based alternatives and likely lower-concern than petroleum-based packaging. The brand doesn't disclose what waterproofing or grease-resistant coating is applied.

The safe swap

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

Footprint

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Compostable fiber pulp with grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
🍳

Grease-resistant coating composition (unspecified)

Interior coating type not disclosed by manufacturer; if fluorochemical-based, migration into fatty or acidic foods is theoretically possible, though compostable fiber products typically see lower migration than plastic due to lower contact temperature in typical use.

70/ 100

Coating degradation over time or when heated

Fiber pulp coatings degrade faster than plastic under heat or repeated hydration; visible peeling, whitening, or flaking signals barrier failure and potential increased chemical migration into food contact.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic-like particles from fiber shedding

Fiber pulp containers can shed microscopic cellulose fragments or coating particles into food, especially when wet or warm; though natural fiber fragments are biodegradable, chronic ingestion of coating particles is unstudied.

70/ 100
⚠️

Inadequate composting end-of-life (field disposal)

Certified compostable containers require industrial composting (55-60°C sustained heat); home or backyard composting may leave coating intact and undigested, trapping coated particles in soil long-term if PFAS-based coatings are present.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Recycled paper or bagasse sources can concentrate metals if improperly sourced, but no recalls or test data for this product indicate a problem; World Centric does not disclose feedstock origin.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

World Centric's TR-SC containers are molded fiber pulp (typically sugarcane bagasse or recycled paper) with a grease-resistant coating applied to the interior. Fiber pulp itself is inert, but the coating is the critical variable: it waterproofs and oil-proofs the container. The specific coating chemistry is not disclosed on the product label or World Centric's public materials, which is the primary concern. Undisclosed coatings in compostable food packaging often contain PFAS compounds (as noted in your PFAS grade), though newer alternatives like wax blends or non-fluorinated polymers exist.

The brand's record and disclosure

World Centric markets this product as certified compostable (typically ASTM D6868 or EN 13432), and the brand has built a reputation around sustainability. However, the company has been notably silent on PFAS use in its coatings, which is increasingly expected transparency from food packaging manufacturers responding to regulatory and consumer pressure. No major recalls or safety violations are on record for this specific SKU. The lack of proactive PFAS disclosure is a red flag relative to competitors like Footprint or some Huhtamaki lines that explicitly state fluorine-free or PFAS-free formulations.

How it compares in its category

Compostable fiber take-out containers occupy a middle ground: they avoid the PFAS certainty of traditional polycoated paperboard (which commonly uses aqueous film-forming Teflon-family coating) and the microplastic risk of PLA clamshells, but they trade transparency for the unknown. Alternatives include certified PFAS-free paperboard (Notpla, some Huhtamaki SKUs) or uncoated/wax-coated fiber (grease performance varies). World Centric's position is weaker on disclosure than leading compostable brands but stronger than legacy fast-food packaging, making it mid-tier in a greening market.

If you buy it

Use only for cold or warm (not hot) foods; prolonged heat (above 65°C/150°F) may degrade the coating and increase migration risk. Check containers before use for visible damage, tears, or delamination of the coating, as compromised barriers increase chemical leaching. Do not microwave. For commercial food service, track batch/case lot numbers in case targeted recalls arise. Request PFAS-free certification or coating ingredient disclosure from World Centric if you use bulk quantities; consumer pressure on transparency may prompt labeling updates.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
World Centric has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.