PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Abena Abri-San Incontinence Pads

Abri-Form · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Abena Abri-San Incontinence Pads

Poor

No PFAS disclosure provided, waterproof layer composition unclear.

Verdict · SkipCellulose-core pad with undisclosed waterproof coating presents PFAS uncertainty; no major toxicant recalls on record, but opacity on barrier chemistry warrants cautious use and contact with manufacturer.

Abena does not disclose PFAS use or avoidance in this pad. The waterproof backing treatment remains unspecified, raising concern about possible fluorinated compounds common in absorbent hygiene.

The better-graded swap

Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cellulose core, polymer backing with unspecified waterproof/moisture-barrier coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Abena Abri-San Incontinence Pads is made of, ingredients and materials

Abri-San pads use a cellulose absorbent core, which is a standard, low-toxicity material in incontinence products. The critical unknown is the waterproof backing layer, the manufacturer does not publicly specify whether this polymer barrier uses PFAS-based coatings (such as perfluorinated compounds) or PFAS-free alternatives. Cellulose itself carries minimal chemical hazard, but the moisture barrier's composition directly determines skin contact risk and environmental persistence if discarded.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Composition of the moisture-barrier layer is not disclosed. Waterproof coatings in incontinence pads historically use PFAS; without confirmation of PFAS-free alternatives, exposure via skin contact during use is a genuine concern, particularly for frequent or long-term users.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🍳

Chemical leachates from unspecified coating

Without disclosure of waterproof-layer chemistry, potential leachates (plasticizers, oligomers, or residual monomers) cannot be ruled out. Prolonged moisture and body heat may increase leaching; risk is speculative but underscored by manufacturer silence.

70/ 100
⚠️

Environmental persistence if incinerated

If the waterproof layer contains PFAS (suspected but unconfirmed), incineration would release or persist fluorinated compounds into ash. Standard household disposal avoids this; industrial waste streams should not incinerate without verification of non-fluorinated composition.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Skin irritation from polymer backing or additives

No dermatological incidents or allergic reactions are documented for this product line. Cellulose core is hypoallergenic; risk is primarily from undisclosed polymer-backing additives (plasticizers, mold inhibitors) in prolonged contact with sensitive skin.

95/ 100
✅

Microplastic or polymer particle shedding

No published evidence of breakdown or particle release from Abri-San pads during normal use. Cellulose cores are biodegradable; the polymer backing could theoretically fragment if damaged, but typical single-use disposal does not present acute microplastic inhalation risk.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Abena (parent company) and the Abri-Form line have no documented major safety recalls or toxicant controversies in public records. However, the company does not proactively disclose waterproof coating chemistry on product labels or safety datasheets, and has not publicly committed to PFAS-free formulations. This silence on a key material is atypical for premium incontinence brands and limits independent safety verification.

How it compares in its category

Incontinence pad safety largely hinges on waterproof-layer composition. Competitors like Tena and Depend also use polymer backings of unspecified chemistry, making this a category-wide disclosure gap. Some manufacturers (e.g., certain eco-labeled products) explicitly state PFAS-free or Teflon-family coating-free status; Abri-San does not. Price and absorbency performance are strong, but transparency lags premium alternatives.

If you buy it

Change pads frequently to minimize prolonged skin contact with the waterproof layer. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat or direct sunlight, which could degrade the backing. Do not incinerate; dispose in household waste to avoid releasing any fluorinated compounds into the environment. If skin irritation develops, discontinue use and contact the manufacturer to request material safety data, including coating composition.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Abri-Form has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.