PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Always Infinity Flexfoam Pads with Wings

Always · Period Pads

Always Infinity Flexfoam Pads with Wings

Poor

Waterproof pads pose moderate PFAS concern; Always doesn't disclose coating chemistry.

Verdict: SkipModerate PFAS concern from water-resistant coating; no other major hazards documented, but Always' silence on chemistry warrants cautious use and consideration of alternatives.

Water-resistant topsheet typically achieves leakproof function through PFAS-based water repellents. Always doesn't disclose coating composition or PFAS status.

The safe swap

Nana Maxi Thick

Nana

Nana Maxi Thick

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

synthetic polymer core with water-resistant topsheet (composition unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant synthetic pads almost certainly use fluorinated compounds (PFAS) on the topsheet. Always does not disclose this chemistry, and PFAS in close contact with sensitive vulval skin poses potential bioaccumulation and endocrine disruption risk with repeated long-term use.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Synthetic polymer skin irritation and allergen potential

Flexfoam core and topsheet polymers, adhesives, and undisclosed additives can trigger contact dermatitis, vulvovaginal irritation, or allergic reactions in sensitive users. No widespread safety alerts exist, but individual sensitivity to synthetic materials in menstrual products is documented.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Synthetic foam and topsheet layers can degrade or shed microfibers during use and disposal, contributing to microplastic ingestion (if fragments contact food or water) and environmental persistence. Always does not test or report shedding rates.

Source: EPA
70/ 100
⚠️

Adhesive and tackifier chemical composition unknown

The adhesive used to attach wings and secure the pad to underwear is not disclosed. Some menstrual pad adhesives contain acrylates, silicones, or other resins that may leach into skin or cause irritation; transparency is absent.

70/ 100
⚠️

Absorption gel or additives not listed

Modern pads often use superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) like sodium polyacrylate and fragrance or odor-control additives; Always does not itemize these. SAPs are generally safe but undisclosed additives prevent full risk assessment.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Always Infinity Flexfoam pads use a synthetic polymer core (likely polypropylene or polyethylene) with an unspecified water-resistant topsheet and adhesive backing. The 'water-resistant' designation almost certainly involves fluorinated chemistry (PFAS) applied to the topsheet to repel menstrual fluid and prevent leaking, though Always does not disclose the specific compounds used. Flexfoam refers to an absorbent foam layer designed to distribute moisture; the exact polymer blend and additives are proprietary. Without transparency, the presence and concentration of PFAS in the topsheet coating cannot be independently verified.

The brand's record and disclosure

Always (owned by Procter and Gamble) does not publicly disclose the chemical composition of its period pads, including the identity of water-resistant coatings or the presence of PFAS. The brand has faced criticism from menstrual health advocates and environmental groups for lack of ingredient transparency, but has not issued formal statements addressing PFAS use or committed to phasing it out. P&G has made limited sustainability commitments on plastics but has not specifically addressed 'forever chemicals' in feminine hygiene products. No recalls specific to chemical hazards in this product line are on record.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional pads (Kotex, Tampax, store brands) use similar water-resistant synthetic topsheets and likely contain PFAS, making Always comparable to the mainstream market rather than a leader. Organic cotton pads (Seventh Generation, Cora, Rael) avoid synthetic topsheets and typically disclose ingredients more openly, reducing PFAS exposure. Reusable cloth pads eliminate synthetic polymers and PFAS entirely but require washing and upfront cost. Always Infinity positions itself as high-absorbency and leak-prevention focused, prioritizing performance over chemical transparency, which reinforces the PFAS concern.

If you buy it

Use pads as directed without heating or microwaving (though not typical for pads, polymer breakdown accelerates heat exposure). Replace pads regularly during use; do not reuse or extend wear beyond recommended intervals, as prolonged skin contact with synthetic materials and adhesives may cause irritation in sensitive individuals. If you experience rash, itching, or odor changes after switching to or using Always pads regularly, discontinue and switch to organic or cotton-based alternatives. Consider rotating between pad brands or mixing with reusable pads to reduce cumulative PFAS and synthetic exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Always has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Pads

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade52Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding or degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade44Poor
⚠️

Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyethylene microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear

High concern

20

Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive contact sensitivity

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bleaching residues in cellulose

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.

Risky category by default

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.